Islamic Law Is Destructive to ‘Unalienable Rights’. “A federal appeals court has blocked an Oklahoma voter-approved measure barring state judges from considering Islamic and international law in their decisions.” Forget about your “rights” – they’ll soon be severed anyway…


After pic HERE – if you dare.

Leave a Reply

24 Comments on "Islamic Law Is Destructive to ‘Unalienable Rights’"

Notify of

toocoldinwa
Member
toocoldinwa
January 23, 2012 9:57 am

At some point in the future, we will have to draw the line on this nonsense, and I apologize to all the future patriots who will suffer or die to put our society back to normal because it could have been stopped now.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 23, 2012 7:26 am

There is a diametrically opposite base for the laws of the U.S. and the law under Isalm. And that is under Islam, you HAVE no unalienable rights. Under Islam, every second of every day is schedule, directed and enforced under Sharia law. It is the complete oipposite of the idea that everyone should have any freedom. Tell me again why we are paying any attention to their laws in America?

hisham
Guest
hisham
January 23, 2012 6:34 pm

“Tell me again why we are paying any attention to their laws in America?”

Why? Because Sharia law falls so gracefully into the dictates of state sponsored socialism, (in other words they are almost seamlessly compatible) that’s why.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 24, 2012 4:31 am

Yet, I don’t remember hearing anything about wanting to observe sharia law in the US until Obama was placed in office. A coincidence? I think not.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
January 24, 2012 9:57 am

Wait till our friends from the land of sand start suing Target and Penny’s for not selling lady burka bags and pajamas for the guys with little accessories like soup bowls for the head….I am sure that is coming…We have an “Islamic” school in the city where I work, We would drive by at night and there would be someone in their peeking out the windows, so we would stop and chat next to the building..They are a weird bunch….Who has someone in a burka peeking out the windows at 1am from a elementary school?

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 24, 2012 4:20 pm

Someone who is using the school building for something far more nefarious than elementary school.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
January 24, 2012 6:06 pm

Yea we nicknamed it the “tiny terrorist training academy”

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 24, 2012 8:14 pm

The sad part is that was probably EXACTLY what was going on!

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 23, 2012 5:14 am

There is nothing anywhere in current US law or in the Constitution, that refers to, defers to, or allows consideration of, Islamic Law when making legal decisions in US courts. Therefore, this judge, IMHO, has made an unconstitutional decision, and it should be overturned in a higher court.

Perhaps this judge would like to preside over a trial of a woman accused of disobeying her husband, or a girl accused of disgracing her family, and he will pass down the death sentence asked for by the man, to satisfy his need for an honor killing? He should also be made to be there in person for the execution! I think that might change his mind.

Jim Stewart
Member
Jim Stewart
January 23, 2012 1:22 am

If I were Tawfik Hamid I’d be looking over my shoulder for the next 25 years.

Old Goat
Member
Old Goat
January 23, 2012 4:42 am

I’d be careful, you might not have a shoulder for long, either…

Ruben
Member
Ruben
January 22, 2012 8:27 pm

Fundie moslems love hand sandwiches.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 23, 2012 7:22 am

EEEEEEEEWWWWWWW!

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 22, 2012 7:33 pm

But Muslims are not doing anything to decrease the rights of American citizens, right? *snort*

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
January 22, 2012 6:28 pm

Perhaps this federal Judge would like to see a few beaten women or people who have been be-headed first hand before he decides to “make Law” in his little god like robe. I said a long time ago, life time appointments for federal judges is one of the stupidest things ever done. Now we are paying for it with activist judges who think they are there to make, not enforce laws…It will be a cold day in hell when I follow any order given by a judge that favors the Islamic gang over the American constitution. Screw them and the judge they rode in on.

The Obumbly Obomster
Member
The Obumbly Obomster
January 22, 2012 4:58 pm

I clicked on the after. I threw up in my mouth. I think I’m going to need therapy.

Flying Tiger Comics
Guest
January 22, 2012 4:37 pm

Revolution time. If you wait for permission to change the world- it won’t change.

Plainsman
Member
Plainsman
January 22, 2012 4:22 pm

Why should federal judges consider any law but the law of OUR land? Why should we give any credence to barbaric Islamic laws? The voters spoke their minds but the liberal judges over rule. Total BS!

andre
Member
andre
January 23, 2012 5:10 am

“Why should federal judges consider any law but the law of OUR land?”

Good Q. Your answer is so they can do whatever the hell they please and create some sort of [lame-ass] “legal” basis for their legislation from the bench.

I am still waiting for the explanation of why the Supremes considered European law when making a decision that concerned some kind of gay activities (was that a TX case?), and not some other law, such as, just picking a country at random here, Saudi Arabia?

So were they saying that European law is better somehow? If so, then why are we having this discussion? Is this appeals court now saying that Islamic law DOES have some validity and should in some cases be considered? Why now and not then?

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 23, 2012 7:22 am

I’m giving you athumbs up on the understanding that you do NOT think any law but U.S. law should be considered in our courts.

andre
Member
andre
January 23, 2012 8:50 am

That’s all that really counts here. Everything else was to point out that even if you warp your brain, you still can’t find even an appearance of logic in some of the decisions coming out of our courts.

michaelht1
Member
michaelht1
January 22, 2012 4:19 pm

nothing like the religion of peace, of course we should expect the federal judges to side with the muslin’s, we have a closet muslin sitting in the white house (or on vacation or on the golf course or doing a photo shoot or going to church for the PR folks. Political correctness at any cost and shred the constitution for any vote!

Teresa
Guest
Teresa
January 23, 2012 3:17 am

Uhm.. I think you meant muslim. Muslin is a fabric. 🙂

michaelht1
Member
michaelht1
January 23, 2012 4:23 am

I stand corrected, operator head space error on my part (of course muslin is worth something, the other not so much)

wpDiscuz