JobsCouncil.jpg
White House Jobs Council hasn’t had a meeting in over a year. It’s a question of priorities, you see. There was a campaign to run, speeches to give, vacations to take, an Islamic takeover of the Middle East to support, guns to confiscate, birth control to mandate, and a fiscal cliff to drive over. Jobs are way down the list for our busy president.

Leave a Reply

24 Comments on "Jobs Council hasn’t had meeting in over a year"

Notify of

Member
Neo-7
January 18, 2013 8:11 am

Sure they do , its in other countries that they meet and find jobs .

Member
NodakSuz
January 18, 2013 8:13 am

An open and transparent administration – the biggest joke of the past four years and lucky us we’ll have four more years of this, that is, if we survive.

Member
jcrowley1985
January 18, 2013 8:16 am

Why would Corporate Greed want to provide more jobs? They couldn’t keep all the money for themselves then.

Member
ooddballz
January 18, 2013 9:14 am

Do you work at being a moron, or is it a gift?

Member
jcrowley1985
January 18, 2013 9:21 am

Genius can be a curse sometimes in that everyone around you is too stupid to believe you.

Member
Elrond Hubbard
January 18, 2013 9:26 am

Don’t worry crowley, you have successfully eluded the curse of genius.

Member
Elrond Hubbard
January 18, 2013 9:18 am

What a profoundly stupid comment.

Member
January 18, 2013 9:22 am

Actually (jeepers I hate to say this), for once he’s on topic. The chairman of the Jobs Council is GE’s Immelt, possibly the most blatant example of corporate greed and hypocrisy in the world. What crowley doesn’t seem to understand is that people like Immelt are not capitalists, they are leeches on the government teat. GE would barely exist without their political connections in Washington and their federal contracts.

Member
sifi
January 18, 2013 9:20 am

Progressives want everyone dependent on government handouts like you. They also want the blame for a bad economy to be put on capitalism like you do. They are using you. You are a tool for socialism.

Guest
January 18, 2013 12:11 pm

Shut up, creepycrawly.

Member
January 18, 2013 9:21 am

We have an impotent House, a corrupt and inept Senate, and a President that thinks he’s an emperor. The only changes in the next four years will come through executive order and the media will continue to allow it without comment.
Also, liberals want to throw out capitalism which is 95% good (there is a greed element) and replace it with a system that is 95% bad. Silly, really, but they hate the power of the wealthy. What they don’t get is that in every country and in every economical system, wealth is power. In socialism, only a scant few have the power for there are fewer wealthy and therefore fewer jobs.

Member
Elrond Hubbard
January 18, 2013 9:21 am

The Obama administration isn’t interested in helping create jobs, it’s interested in making people more dependent on government. People dependent on government will vote to keep that government in power.

Member
sifi
January 18, 2013 10:03 am

Cha-Ching

Member
January 18, 2013 7:48 pm

Hit the nail on the head!

Member
GhostntheMachine
January 19, 2013 3:50 am

So does that mean these guys are collecting unemployment?

Member
Not so silent
January 18, 2013 9:47 am

It’s hard to have a meeting with the chairman (Immelt) stuck to Obama’s ass, and it’s hard to sit in a chair when you have a large white guy glued to your butt.

Member
Jim Stewart
January 18, 2013 10:07 am

What the hell? Obama has a job and that’s all that matters to him.

Member
deepthinker
January 18, 2013 10:10 am

Doesn’t that make it fraud and embezzling? Getting paid for not working, oh wait a minute that’s the democratic way. Take from those that show for work and give it to those that won’t, never mind. Carry on.

Member
Extirpates
January 18, 2013 10:28 am

With the outstanding record of employment by this administration, there was no real excuse for a meeting!

Guest
January 18, 2013 12:12 pm

Oh, but they mean well, and that’s what counts, right?

Member
Sidekick
January 18, 2013 7:25 pm

Right. Always judge liberalism on its intent not its results.

Member
January 18, 2013 7:49 pm

Haven’t we learned nothing from David Gregory…. It’s ALL about intent.

Member
danybhoy
January 19, 2013 4:57 am

Right. Always judge liberalism on its intent not its results…

Remember, liberalism ALWAYS generates the exact opposite of it’s stated intent

Haven’t we learned nothing from David Gregory…. It’s ALL about intent.

I would say being connected & by being in favor with those who should have done their duty & prosicuted the m-effer.

Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid
January 18, 2013 2:01 pm

“Dear Leader’s” jobs council only meets one a year to see what kind of tax breaks they can get for shipping more of our jobs and technology to China. Then promptly kick back a percentage to the Commicrats re-election funds.

wpDiscuz