King Barry at his coronation:”Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,”: Wrong O Duce. It requires Presidents bound by the Constitution. It requires an executive branch that doesn’t legislate away -by fiat- those rights of the individual that were God’s to grant and no man’s to take away.

Leave a Reply

27 Comments on "King Barry at his coronation:”Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action,”"

Notify of

Big Al
Member
Big Al
January 22, 2013 4:56 am

”Preserving our individual freedoms ultimately requires collective action.”- That sounds like something from “Animal Farm” or “1984”.

deepthinker
Member
deepthinker
January 22, 2013 4:09 am

I’ve heard them. Again from British web sites. He is a true communist and its impossible to deny it. Someone with in the opposition must step forward and challenge him at every step. Otherwise he’s going to ram his “agenda” down all our throats. Right now it looks like the one willing to challenge him is Rand Paul in the Senste. As for the House we are looking for the champion of the average people not the roll over dogs that are there now.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 22, 2013 3:45 pm

Does anyone have a link to hear those interviews? I would certainly like to hear them or at least read transcripts.

deepthinker
Member
deepthinker
January 21, 2013 6:42 pm

I thought collective was code for communist attitude. And all the lap dogs just sucked it all up.

The wolf has removed its cloak and now is bearing its teeth.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick
January 21, 2013 7:50 pm

He used to speak like that before he got involved in national politics. There is a now well known series of radio interviews that he did the 1990s. Had the media done its job in 2007, he likely would never have been nominated.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:41 am

Had the media done its job in 2007, he likely would never have been nominated.

I’d like to believe that, but have my doubts.

jcrowley1985
Member
jcrowley1985
January 21, 2013 5:43 pm

It requires presidents bound by the constitution; presidents like Ron Paul.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:36 am

Ron Paul couldn’t get elected president, not even of his own fan club!

PsychoDad
Guest
January 21, 2013 10:26 pm

Shuttup, creepycrawly.

pink Floyd
Member
pink Floyd
January 21, 2013 6:12 pm

“It requires presidents bound by the constitution”
Thumbs up on this part!!!

“presidents like Ron Paul.”
Holy Shit! You are a Fucking broken record. Get over it already!

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 21, 2013 10:02 pm

Whistle will never stop as long as he knows people see his shit. It is so old and tiring. We’ve asked for relief by administrative action to ban turdball, but we cannot expect it. If everyone, and by that I mean each and every single one of the regulars would simply not respond to him at all, just thumb down and not even read it, he might stop showing up because if nobody gives him anything in response, it won’t feed his petty need for attention. But it seems we can’t do that.

ooddballz
Member
ooddballz
January 21, 2013 10:07 pm

Sorry Harry, as annoying as the little turdball is, I will NOT call for banning him. TD and MO yes, but banning him is akin to censorship, and I can’t condone that.

PsychoDad
Guest
January 21, 2013 10:33 pm

Ballzy, in many circumstances I would agree with you, but in this case, it’s not like he’s even bringing meaningful to the table, not even anything we can snicker about, let alone some substantial point on which to hang a discussion. Remember Princess Bedpan? At least she raised interesting and relevant topics, which we all enjoyed cutting to ribbons. Creepycrawly doesn’t even approach that. He’s like a scratch on a record (yikes! How long will THAT be understood?!?) that does nothing but interrupt a song with a blob of noise. Or the drip you can hear from the bathroom sink in the middle of the night. Nothing but a minor irritation which doesn’t even merit the attention it demands. It’s effectively NOTHING. And you can’t censor NOTHING.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:39 am

Problem is, he’s annoying, he’s stupid, but he hasn’t done anything to get banned for.

PsychoDad
Guest
January 22, 2013 11:19 am

Annoying & stupid would be reason enough in my book.

When IS the last time we heard from Princess Bedpan, anyway? Did she finally collapse into a black hole of idiocy?

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 22, 2013 3:43 pm

She had claimed she was ill. Maybe it was more serious than she let on. Maybe she got tired of being completing destroyed in her liberal idiocy. Haven’t heard from her in a while, and I don’t think she could read and not respond.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
January 22, 2013 3:41 pm

She had a relapse of rectal/cranial inversion and this time it took, it can not be reversed. She is now unable to type since she can not focus on a keyboard…..

drb
Member
drb
January 22, 2013 3:44 pm

I think she got banned…no way she could stay away this long by her own choosing…good riddance I say.

drb
Member
drb
January 22, 2013 5:58 pm

well poppa you are entitled to you opinion of curse…but you have to remember, she thinks she won those arguements. and there is no way she wouldn’t have come back to gloat over the fraud in chief’s being voter frauded back into office, unless something outside of her control happened to prevent her from doing so.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 5:38 pm

I doubt banning happened, most likely got tired of fighting with people smarter than her. It must suck to lose every argument.

flashingscotsman
Member
January 22, 2013 9:49 am

The people I’ve seen banned from this site gave VERY good reason for their banishment. Crawley is just annoying and stupid.

TD,………………………MO.

pink Floyd
Member
pink Floyd
January 21, 2013 5:41 pm

If he’s not careful, he’s going to get some collective action.
It just won’t be the action that he expects.

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent
January 21, 2013 4:59 pm

“collective?” what is he the Borg? Sorry Barry but I ain’t part of no collective, nor am I part of your fan club, In fact I detest you, your lunatic fringe friends and your smart ass cocky attitude…. Pretty much Barry you go bugger yourself and the equine convenience you rode in on…

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 22, 2013 6:35 am

No, he married a Borg.

MDLION
Member
MDLION
January 21, 2013 4:33 pm

King Barry’s inauguration “coronation” and the mob there today bring to mind a scripture:

“[A]bout us the wicked strut
and in high place are the basest of men.” -Psalm 12:9

Missile Command
Member
Missile Command
January 21, 2013 4:00 pm

The only individual freedoms Chairman O seems anxious to expand on are his own:
– freedom from congressional oversight
– freedom to start wars as he pleases
– freedom to spend as he damn well pleases when he damn well pleases
– freedom from following laws he considers inconvenient
– freedom to lie to the American people
– freedom from answering hard questions
– freedom to raid the treasury and give taxpayer money to his cronies

redabogado
Member
redabogado
January 21, 2013 3:48 pm

Remember El Duce #1. Sure a few (thousands) were murdered, but the trains ran on time in Italy!!!!

wpDiscuz