NatureLogo.jpg
Nature beclowns itself. In what one scientist called the worst paper she has ever seen in a reputable journal, Nature published a study which combines false equivalencies, cherry-picked errors in both category and categorization, and unreliable partisan sources to (somehow) reach the laughable conclusion that climate change skeptics have too much media visibility. Somehow the so-called study arrives at this conclusion without mentioning Al Gore, Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez, Leonardo DiCaprio, the pope, or the British royal family, begging the question of what they consider “media visibility.”

6
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
5 Comment threads
1 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
6 Comment authors
Not so silentJPTravisPlainsmanpoppajoe49Joe Redfield Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

Honestly I thought this was a magazine about nudist clubs….Never saw it, or even heard of it till now.

Plainsman
Member
Plainsman

I read a book not long ago called The Hockey Stick Illusion. Its a bit of a chore to get through and I don’t pretend to understand all the scientific information, but the REAL shocker in the story it tells of Michael Mann and the IPCC is how corrupt they were/are. Peer review…? it’s a joke. The IPCC is stacked with globalists that want control and that’s all there is to it. They have lied and cheated and duped the public at every step.

https://www.amazon.com/Hockey-Stick-Illusion-W-Montford/dp/0957313527

JPTravis
Member

And never forget that guy who was in charge of the IPCC back then, Rajendra K. Pachauri, was no kind of climate scientist at all. He was merely a bureaucrat assigned by the U.N. to push an agenda. His education was in “industrial engineering” and economics, which is basically a social sciences education. And yet every time an actual scientist tried to question the IPCC’s findings, the IPCC would call into question that person’s qualifications to comment on climate science. It was incredible hutzpah.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49

There isn’t one reputable science journal that can admit they’re wrong about Globull Warming, which makes them all disreputable,

Joe Redfield
Member
Joe Redfield

Making a list…that has ominous overtones. Here is yet another good reason to vote for Trump next year.

deepthinker
Member
deepthinker

Nothing like spinning a study to create the findings you wish. Welcome to the dip shit agenda. They can fly private, the surfs must take public transportation.