Nature beclowns itself. In what one scientist called the worst paper she has ever seen in a reputable journal, Nature published a study which combines false equivalencies, cherry-picked errors in both category and categorization, and unreliable partisan sources to (somehow) reach the laughable conclusion that climate change skeptics have too much media visibility. Somehow the so-called study arrives at this conclusion without mentioning Al Gore, Alexandria-Ocasio Cortez, Leonardo DiCaprio, the pope, or the British royal family, begging the question of what they consider “media visibility.”
