SandyHookElementary.jpg
NBC reporting that Adam Lanza took nothing but handguns into school. No rifle. If true, it means all this “assault rifle” hysteria Democrats are generating is irrelevant to what happened at Sandy Hook Elementary School.

Leave a Reply

28 Comments on "NBC reporting that Adam Lanza took nothing but handguns into school"

Notify of

RKae
Member
RKae
January 20, 2013 9:27 am

THIS video knocked me back: (The web-site in the link is a little bizarre; yeah, it’s a “truther” site, but the article is jaw-dropping.)

http://theintelhub.com/2013/01/19/sandy-hook-smoking-gun-revealed-factions-of-government-law-enforcement-and-mainstream-media-including-anderson-cooper-engaged-in-treason-against-the-united-states-and-its-citizens/

Scroll down to the CNN video embedded in the article. At the 1:00 mark, you’ll see officers running at the school entrance like action heroes. It’s NOT from Sandy Hook. It’s footage from a drill at a different school (St. Rose Pre-School) that’s happening THE SAME DAY! That means that 1.) CNN knew about the drill at St. Rose; 2.) CNN was shooting video of that drill; 3.) CNN decided to edit the drill footage from St. Rose into the footage from Sandy Hook Elementary and pass it off as “real” WHILE their coverage of the Sandy Hook event was going on. (The CNN video was created on Dec. 14!)

This is friggin’ sinister!

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid
January 20, 2013 6:09 am

Looks like the Lame Stream media lies are starting to unravel. Something defiantly smells fishy, you would have thought that a grade school in a state as paranoid as CT. would have some form of video surveillance. Yet no mention of videos from the school.

TOWG
Member
TOWG
January 20, 2013 5:56 am

There are a lot of unanswered questions about the Sandy Hook shootings. The one that sticks out for me is, why no injured survivors? When was the last time a mass shooting had 0 injured? Yes, I realize that is 2 questions but they are sort of related.

Big Al
Member
Big Al
January 20, 2013 3:49 am

When 0dumbo gave his gun speech he mentioned the Aurora shooter AR but not Sandy Hook. I didn’t find it strange as I have believed for a while that no AR was used at Sandy Hook.

http://www.wnd.com/wnd_video/sandy-hook-media-myths/

ThatOtherGuy
Member
ThatOtherGuy
January 19, 2013 11:32 pm

Handguns or rifles, it would have been better for the kids to not have been shot. As much as I’d like the story to be true, it seems he did use an AR. The lack of information coming out about the shootings, considering there are no trials to be done leaves a lot of room for speculation.

The fact that any stories came out citing only handguns is troubling. AR shell casings and magazine, not to mention the rifle itself, you would think would be hard to overlook or misidentify. The lack of disclosure in this attack leads me to think they are waiting till a critical vote before releasing anything else.

Be careful with this story. Chances are that he used an AR. If it was a conspiracy, why not use an AR and cement the chances of legislation? In most people’s eyes the type of gun won’t matter and talking about missing guns and conspiracy will just marginalize the pro-2A movement in some people’s eyes.

Let’s press them to release more about the shootings, maybe some pics of evidence, something tangible rather than month old new reports and easily manipulated time stamps.

Bushmaster, meh. BCM, Noveske- I’ll do a Daniel Defense before I’d go with a Bushmaster. Colts aren’t (or weren’t) that much more than other quality ARs. It all depends on how it does on The Chart. 😉

JPTravis
Member
January 20, 2013 6:36 am

“Be careful with this story.”

I agree. Whether it’s true or not that handguns were used, they will marginalize anyone who suggests it. The left has a story that supports their agenda and they’re going to stick to it.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick
January 19, 2013 8:23 pm

There’s a 30 minute video on You Tube that debunks Sandy Hook. It s pretty compelling.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VrngdgUixYg&feature=youtube_gdata_player

JPTravis
Member
January 19, 2013 9:18 pm

That’s a scary video. Two Sandy Hook victim funds created days before the Sandy Hook shooting… c’mon, how can that be explained away?

I read Jayna Davis’s book “The Third Terrorist” and there’s absolutely no doubt that Timothy McVeigh did not bomb the Oklahoma federal building. Absolutely no doubt. She did meticulous research, she talked to FBI agents, and she showed her documentation to an attorney usd to participating in government investigations. This is no whacked out conspiracy theory – Iraqis bombed that building.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick
January 20, 2013 6:55 am

Nothing is as it seems. I hate to sound like that but it is true. The way McVeigh was so quickly picked up, tried, and executed always struck me as wrong.

By the way, I haven’t spoken to my uncle (the priest in the video i linked) about any of this. I think I may go through my cousins and see what the latest is in SH.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 21, 2013 5:35 am

And Lee Harvey Oswald was working alone. I recommend watching the movie Arlington Road. It is very thought provoling, especially when stories like this are reported.

Neo-7
Member
Neo-7
January 20, 2013 4:00 pm

Just like Waco , the Mura building was bulldozed quickly , destroying an evidence that might have been . Just the demolition aspects of the bombing defies physics .

Oh well , another day in Obsurdastan

flashingscotsman
Member
January 19, 2013 6:43 pm

I still haven’t heard any official explanations of the two other guys who were arrested at the scene.

RKae
Member
RKae
January 19, 2013 4:53 pm

Well, that’s a whole hell of a lot of reloading that he had to do, then, since they were telling us that every victim was shot multiple times.

It’s like the report of his mother being a teacher at the school: That wasn’t “misreporting”; it was a flat-out lie. We have video of a reporter saying she “met the woman who has been the school nurse for the last 15 years, she had locked eyes with the killer, and knew him as the son of a kindergarten teacher at the school who was a very nice woman that everyone loved.”

…and as if that story wasn’t enough of a lie, they then told us he was wearing a mask.

I’m with the conspiracy nuts on this one. This whole story is BS. It was a shooting at a Potemkin village.

JPTravis
Member
January 19, 2013 5:00 pm

This is an amazing story. If you read the excerpt at Maggie’s Notebook and the original source she links to, this NBC video is from a month ago. So where has this information been hiding while Democrats have been busy trying to outlaw “assault rifles?”

Something smells in Denmark.

deepthinker
Member
deepthinker
January 19, 2013 3:58 pm

It is about time that the msm told the damn truth about what weapons Lanza used. Since the initial reports where written it was known that he used a Glock and a Sig Sauer. The AR15 was found in the trunk of the car. It is also known that he shot his way into the school through the locked door. That is why the principle and guidance counselor came running. They heard the glass exploding.

Now that nbc has chosen to go against der leader and his administration, will they suffer the same fate as Fox News at the pressers from now on?

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 20, 2013 1:46 am

The rifle – or shotgun – in the trunk was not an AR15 type. Actuator on right side of receiver. AR15 does not have that. Watch the video and you’ll see the cop jack the bolt a few times with it. ARs don’t work like that.

Big Al
Member
Big Al
January 20, 2013 3:39 am

It looks like a Saiga shotgun to me.

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 20, 2013 3:49 am

Especially with the low quality of the video, I could not differentiate between any AK type or another AK type, such as the Saiga shotguns. If the distinct profile of a magazine was protruding from it then sure. Is there a better resolution video out there? I’d look it over if I could find one. I just looked at it again and this time I might see a second tube, either its a extended magazine tube of a shotgun like a Remington 1100 or 1187 type or any of the others of that configuration made by many manufacturers. The other tube could make it an AK type rifle or any of them with the gas tube on top. The video is just too crappy to be sure. I just looked at slomo of it and it sure looks like a shot shell tumbles out of the gun into the trunk. My eyes go fuzzy after watching it too many times. I still think it has a barrel and an extended mag tube, but can’t be sure.

DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 19, 2013 3:19 pm

Well, that sure clears things up! Took em a month to figure that the shell casings laying about the floor were not from a rifle. Remington .223 and NATO 5.56 mm shell cases look almost exactly the same as what kind of pistol cartridge case again? I seem to have forgotten… And that thing in the trunk, the one with the actuator on the right side of the receiver, what was that again, cuz it sure wasn’t any of the AR type variants?

Bushmasters and all the other quality AR15 duplicates have tripled in price in the last 3 weeks. Colt only recently began selling the civilian M4 to the public, and they were always higher priced. I wonder what they cost now?

PsychoDad
Guest
January 19, 2013 3:31 pm
DefHarryMelon
Member
DefHarryMelon
January 19, 2013 3:41 pm

That’s what they were going for since they introduced em. Now if I could just squeeze out that gold nugget I’ve been digesting for days…

guysmiley
Member
guysmiley
January 19, 2013 5:35 pm

I bought a Sig Sauer 516 Patrol rifle (piston version) from a vendor on gunbroker a year ago for $1200. I looked at his sight Thurs. for the heck of it and he had a base model S&W M & P which I’ve seen as low as $650 last year, for $2050, and he only had one. Tennessee was completely out-the whole state- of AR15’s.

flashingscotsman
Member
January 19, 2013 6:40 pm

When I went last week to transfer ownership of my Glock, there was very little of anything on the shelves of a large gun shop. And the ammo shop across the street had NOTHING in 9mm.

wingater
Member
wingater
January 19, 2013 2:33 pm

Maybe it’s just no longer possible to get one true accounting of anything. Seems like there should be enough witnesses to determine whether or not there was a rifle used in the school.

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose
January 21, 2013 5:32 am

As I understand it ( and I don’t necessarily claim I have it right) Lanza only used handguns, but a news outlet photographed a trooper removing a rifle from the trunk of a car (? Lanza’s ?) which led to the talk of rifes being used in the attack.

ooddballz
Member
ooddballz
January 19, 2013 2:22 pm

How dare NBC go against the grain and report the truth?
Pretty sure they will receive a strongly worded letter from the ministry of truth any day now.

PsychoDad
Guest
January 19, 2013 2:10 pm

Don’t tell ’em,or you’ll just get the little shortbusers all agitated about handguns too.

poppajoe49
Member
poppajoe49
January 20, 2013 6:54 am

They have always been agitated over handguns, and will again, as soon as the devil of the moment loses the spotlight.

wpDiscuz