“The conceptual penis as a social construct.” A fake social science paper got published in a “peer reviewed” journal, demonstrating the intellectual vacuousness of “culture studies” in academia. The phony paper even linked “toxic masculinity” to climate change, which surely must have made the “peers” salivate:
“Nowhere are the consequences of hypermasculine machismo braggadocio isomorphic identification with the conceptual penis more problematic than concerning the issue of climate change. Climate change is driven by nothing more than it is by certain damaging themes in hypermasculinity that can be best understood via the dominant rapacious approach to climate ecology identifiable with the conceptual penis.”
Are your brain cells shriveling like it’s cold outside?