GallupUnemployment_Nov2012.jpg
Unemployment moves sharply higher after election. “It is unclear what caused the increase in the unemployment rate in November,” says Gallup. Here’s a thought that occurs to us, Gallup: maybe the unemployment rate reported before the election was a dastardly lie to ensure a certain ineffective president’s re-election.

Leave a Reply

49 Comments on "Unemployment moves sharply higher after election"

Notify of
trackback

[…] the article here: Unemployment moves sharply higher after election Tags: new format Category: 2010 Elections You can follow any responses to this entry via RSS. […]

flashingscotsman
Member

“maybe the unemployment rate reported before the election was a dastardly lie to ensure a certain ineffective president’s re-election.”

Or maybe, the rate actually HAS skyrocketed since the election?

RobertW
Member

why not both?

GhostntheMachine
Member

What unemployment Robert?

http://cnsnews.com/news/article/unemployment-plunges-38-government-workers-government-adds-35000-jobs-november-544000

“In October, federal, state and local governments in the United States employed 20,524,000 people. In November, that climbed to 20,559,000.”

RobertW
Member

that’s not only outrageous, it’s absurd!

GhostntheMachine
Member

Why yes. Yes it is.

drb
Member

indeed

flashingscotsman
Member

They needed new people to process the unemployment checks.

deepthinker
Member

Those pesky numbers have away of being proven correct. Looks like Jack did know his shit. Welch called the number bogus and those that put them out liars. Vindication is all that can be said.

jcrowley1985
Member

Should have gone with Ron Paul.

ooddballz
Member

Yeah, we “seen the light” and voted for Romney, you essentially voted for four more years.

jcrowley1985
Member

Paul would have gotten the RNC nomination if Romney didn’t cheat and would have easily beat Obama. So you basically voted for Obama by not supporting Paul at the convention.

ooddballz
Member

OhhhhhhKaaaaay, let me type this REAL SLOW so that even a retard like you can read it.
Ron Paul NEVER STOOD A FUCKING SNOWBALLS CHANCE IN HELL OF GETTING THE NOMINATION.
The only person who “cheated” Ron Paul was RON PAUL!
There is simply NO FUCKING WAY that some moron who thinks it is okay to give a bunch of 7th century ragheads ATOMIC WEAPONS is going to get nominated to anything more than a wrap around sports coat.

As I said before, Dr. Paul has some great domestic ideas, however his foreign policy is about as intelligent as the average I.Q. of a turnip.

drb
Member

ooddballz, why are you talking to a brick wall?

ooddballz
Member

What poppa said.

poppajoe49
Member

Because a brick wall is smarter than Crowley.

CO2Insanity
Admin

He obviously had his one lucid post of the year yesterday. Will probably be at least another year before we get another one.

jcrowley1985
Member

You mean how we also found ATOMIC WEAPONS in Iraq 10 years ago?

Wait… we didn’t. Same deal here.

GhostntheMachine
Member

Here twerp, live and learn

http://winteryknight.wordpress.com/2012/12/07/surprise-wmds-from-iraq-were-moved-to-syria-by-saddam-hussein/

Of course in your world he never had WMDs either, that was fairy dust he gassed his own people with.
I voted for Ron Paul too! For him to sit down and shut up.

RobertW
Member

so good to have verifiable info re: WMD. Seems this validates former POTUS Bush’s actions.
as for me, I considered so damn insane to be viably recognizable as a WMD.

Not so silent
Member

I think he is getting aroused again…He’s got Ron paul on his mind.

GhostntheMachine
Member

I recall WMDs, nukes not so much. What did I miss?

poppajoe49
Member

He’s hallucinating. Must have had an OD of Kool Aid.

drb
Member

nothin’

PsychoDad
Guest

Yep, you’re right. ABsolutely.We’ve seen the light. You don;t need to tell us any more. I think you should go work on the folks at the Kos for a while now, we’re convinced, bye-bye, don;t let the door hit you in the arse on your way out.

danybhoy
Member

Seen the light? How about we get crowley to “walk toward the light”?

Not so silent
Member

Specifically a pair of lights in the number one lane of a freeway.

poppajoe49
Member

Or the light at the end of the tunnel, the train tunnel.

DefHarryMelon
Member

Just light him. Less difficult.

danybhoy
Member

Here is something I should have had in the prior post. Obama met with several of the hosts from MSNBC about the “fiscal cliff”…

http://www.politico.com/politico44/2012/12/west-wing-confab-for-liberal-media-151064.html

…this tells me a coulpe of things…

1. That MSNBC is a gov’t sponsered enity. There is ZERO seperation, & the folks at MSNBC will regret this meeting down the road.

2. That Obama is not serious about improving the economy. He does’nt know anyone who understands economics, & therefore, he will never get any good advice. Does’nt matter now, the morons gave him another 4 years, & I hope he sticks it to them where it hurts.

StrinaM
Member

I would have been ok with it if he had also invited Neil Cavuto, Lou Dobbs and John Stossel.

flashingscotsman
Member

I would pay money to see those three duke it out with the MESSNBC crowd.

Jim Stewart
Member

> I hope he sticks it to them where it hurts. <

I tend to agree with that sentiment but a lot of Romney voters are going to be dragged under, too.

danybhoy
Member

I know, but we are now in addiction mode. Sad part, you need to hit bottom, & the last 4 years of idiocy were not enough to hit bottom. I am afraid to see what that will be, & I just hope we can recover afterwards.

flashingscotsman
Member

First step, you have to admit you have a problem. All these tards are still running around thinking Obama is going to fix things.

poppajoe49
Member

Uh Oh, Looks like California finally reported their unemployment numbers!

danybhoy
Member

Moving higher? You ain’t seen sh!t. Wait until the market really reacts to Obama & his merry band of economic retards. 15% unemployment could be here things go to plan for the regime.

JPTravis
Member

I’m pretty sure the rate is already 15%. They’ve been lying for four years, fewer people are working than when he took office, and they’ve been simply reducing the size of the workforce to make the rate look lower: http://www.jpattitude.com/120204.php

danybhoy
Member

I think the real rate (U6) around 15%, but I’m talking the offical reported rate.

Sidekick
Member

I’ve seen charts that claim that real unemployment is over 20%. I imagine that the true number is between 15% and 22%. How many “never employeds” are out there living off of the welfare state? I bet millions.

jcrowley1985
Member

Only because Corporate Greed took all the jobs away.

poppajoe49
Member

Speaking of “never employeds”, look who’s here!

Not so silent
Member

You would think by now either Cheeto’s or the people who make blow up sex dollas would have hired him as their spokes-it/man/woman/whatever.

poppajoe49
Member

But then, he would have to work for a corporation!

flashingscotsman
Member

My business isn’t incorporated, but then again, I would let him work for me.

StrinaM
Member

Merry band of economic retards! LMAO!

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

Were the correct numbers posted before or after Eric the Red’s DOJ threatened Gallup?

Bonfire of the Absurdities
Member

Gosh, it’s almost like the figures were being manipulated to make the Dear Leader look good, isn’t it? That kind of crap only happens in totalitarian shitholes….

StrinaM
Member

Was going to say, amazing what happens when the true numbers come out. But even bringing this up is raaaaaaacist!

wpDiscuz