Voter fraud! 129% of registered Boston vote on election day? We have another winner.
11 Comments on "Voter fraud! 129% of registered Boston vote on election day?"
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Yeah, it doesn’t sound like this is an issue — “cards cast” =/= “votes recorded.”
Not to say there weren’t shenanigans elsewhere, but honestly, stuffing the boxes in BOSTON?!?! Talk about carrying coals to Newcastle . . .
But if you go to page 7 of the linked report, yes, it reports 387142 voters, and in the next section over, 250295 total votes. With almost 80% for Sock Puppet, and further down, 75% for Dances-With-Truth.
AGAIN, cards counted is not the same thing as voters who voted. We don’t do the conservative cause any good by shouting “wolf” when there is no wolf.
Again, read my comment on the other thread: http://www.ihatethemedia.com/breaking-st-lucie-county-florida-had-1411-turnout-obama-won-county
You mean “The sheets were coded so that they would only count as one card.”
I could see the machines counting and reporting raw card counts, but also tracking multi-card “ballots” through such coding–i.e. each set of cards has coding which amounts to a ballot_id in the database. Depends on the software.. which really should be open source
The only problem I would have with it being open source is that some smartass would likely hack into it and screw with the code.
If you look at the data in the PDF, you will see that the Votes Counted is well below the number of Registered Voters in every precinct. Don’t buy the cut/paste BS analysis. Cards Cast is an artifact of scanning multi-page ballot.
I reiterate the reiteration of my reiteration: FRAUD ALERT! FRAUD ALERT!
I’ve seen this coming for a long time, I just didn’t think we’d become a Banana Republic so quickly.