Woman Warns Philly Police That Alleged Cop Shooter Was Part of Radical Group. Oops! Not a lone wolf.

15
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
5 Comment threads
10 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
8 Comment authors
Not so silentKip Hookerbluesjunkypoppajoe49Mobilian Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

Deport, Deport, Deport…..Solves the problem with Islam….Pestilence, filth and mental illness needs to be contained to the middle east, they seem to enjoy it and they are very good at it…..

Red Robster
Member
Red Robster

Deport? He’ll get back. Execute, or bedlam him

Mobilian
Member
Mobilian

I wonder if this mosque where he became more radicalized is the same one that the pigs head was left? http://www.cnn.com/2015/12/08/politics/philadelphia-mosque-pigs-head/

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

Ok, so we have an Islamic terrorist cell in Philly, and nobody wants to investigate it. So when one of them goes and slaughters a bunch of people in a gun free zone, it will be another gun control issue.

Red Robster
Member
Red Robster

Alleged? The vid is proof enuf for the shooting, and he admitted his crime and why he did it.

StrinaM
Member

CBS and Authorities still questioning if he did it in the name of Islam. So far Authorities have refused to charge him with terror.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

Unless Barky gives his OK, he never will.
Look to see him be charged with gun crimes, and them use him to push the anti gun agenda.

bluesjunky
Member
bluesjunky

Yeah, that doofus mayor did his best to make it a gun control issue from the start, saying there were too many guns on the street. Except it was a stolen COP’S gun that he used.

And he said something else that I found strange…he said it was an issue that the “national gov’t” needed to address. I don’t think I’ve ever heard the phrase “national gov’t”. Are they switching “federal” with “national” now because the public thinks the “federal gov’t” sucks ass? Much like they switched from “progressive” to “liberal” when the public got fed up with what Wilson was selling?

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

In the mind of the left, the national government is what they want. Federal government reminds them of what was actually intended when the Federalist Papers and Constitution were written. If they can start convincing people that we are ruled by a national government, they can also convince them that whoever is president now (Barky) makes the rules and laws, and whatever the Constitution says is outdated and irrelevant.

BTW, have you noticed the commercials on FOX News recently, from “Americans for Responsible Solutions” touting the King Barky Exec Order about gun control? Who cares about that old fashioned Constitution? It’s outdated and irrelevant! We are making headway even though congress refuses to make gun ownership illegal! Baby steps. We will get your guns sooner or later!

I hope I never see the day.

Kip Hooker
Member

Obama:

Sure I lied to you about amnesty, health care, mass surveillance, coal, ISIS but when I say I don’t intend to take your guns you can believe me.

bluesjunky
Member
bluesjunky

That was the FIRST thing I thought of when he started with the “I’m not going after your guns.” bullshit. Who in their RIGHT MIND would believe ANYTHING coming outta that progressive pie hole? (Liberals being excluded from the question, since liberalism is a mental disorder.)

bluesjunky
Member
bluesjunky

Yeah, I saw that this morning…and at the end it sez, “It’s working.” By who’s standards?

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

By progressive standards.

Red Robster
Member
Red Robster

Mind of the left? You go to far

Red Robster
Member
Red Robster

Yay for isolationism.