New York cigarette tax leads to reduced consumption which leads to tax shortfall which leads to dumbfounded officials

by editor on November 17, 2010

When will they learn? The economic geniuses in New York raised cigarette taxes by 58%, which increased the price of pack of smokes in New York city to a remarkable $11.60.

cigarette-tax-new-york

There's only one solution, New York: Lower the legal smoking age

As you might expect, cigarette sales plunged by 27%. As you also might expect, cigarette sales are up by more than 40% in neighboring states and Indian reservations.

The NY Post reports the “duh” details:

Sales of taxed cigarettes have plummeted a staggering 27 percent statewide since the highest cigarette tax in the nation took hold in July, a Post analysis has found…

“That’s what we warned would happen, and obviously it has come to fruition,” said James Calvin, of the New York Association of Convenience Stores.

“Every tax increase drives more smokers to that dark, shadowy, unregulated, unlicensed, untaxed side of the street. The whole policy is self-defeating.”

If the trend continues, the state could fall far short of the $260 million windfall Paterson expected from the 58 percent tax hike.

How do you solve the shortfall? Liberals would tell you the only solution is to raise taxes.

Source: New York Post

{ 12 comments… read them below or add one }

YT November 17, 2010 at 8:03 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

RJR and PM should show people pictures of how much their cigs are in USD in other countries. I bought marborlos for about $2.00 per pack and their off-brands for as little as $0.50 in the middle east.

Reply to this specific comment

CurtisHx November 17, 2010 at 8:07 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Any idiot who’s ever taken an Economics 101 class knows that you maximize profits where the demand curve meets the supply the curve. In this case, they have move away from that “sweet spot” by jacking up prices.

Reply to this specific comment

OperaNerd1986 November 17, 2010 at 10:32 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

I agree with you. It’s as though the New York government thought that people were so addicted to smoking that they would continue buying cigarettes regardless of the price. Instead, they just gave people another incentive to quit.

Reply to this specific comment

John Barton November 17, 2010 at 11:20 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

If you want less of something TAX it. If you want fewer people buying cigarettes TAX it. If you want fewer business hiring fewer people, raise taxes, (payroll taxes), etc. Of course fewer people hired and working means fewer people paying taxes.

Statists use tax policy to punish. Paul Krugman won a Nobel Prize for that kind of crap. In the end everyone suffers. I suppose that’s the result progressives desire.

Reply to this specific comment

perlcat November 17, 2010 at 1:47 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

A clarification.

If you want fewer people buying cigarettes TAX it, but stop before you reach the point where buying them illegally becomes attractive.

Reply to this specific comment

danybhoy November 18, 2010 at 2:37 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Gov’t regualtion is usually how black markets are formed. So if you are scoring at home…Over bearing gov’t regulation = Organized Crime.

Liberalism: Ideas so good they need to be mandatory.
Andrew Wilkow

Reply to this specific comment

KimmyQueen November 18, 2010 at 1:21 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

This is what liberals do not understand. They do not see that there is a tax in everything and not raising tax on something means that something else will get taxed so there is NEVER a true lowering of taxes as far as liberals politicians are concerned.

Reply to this specific comment

mojo November 17, 2010 at 12:45 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

Taxable Sales, but not necessarily consumption. I’m bettin’ the “bent-nose boys” are taking in mounds of cash. There’s a hell of a mark-up on a semi load of butts.

Reply to this specific comment

Elrond Hubbard November 17, 2010 at 1:32 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

You can’t abolish the laws of supply and demand. If there’s a demand for cheap, untaxed cigarettes, people will supply them. I lived in NYC when they banned fireworks, within days I could buy any firework I desired from entrepreneurs on Canal Street. It won’t be any different with tobacco.

Reply to this specific comment

Jim Stewart November 17, 2010 at 2:56 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Why do liberals have such a hard time understanding how raising taxes (or prices) lowers demand?

Reply to this specific comment

Deb November 18, 2010 at 12:36 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

So on one hand, everyone is told they should stop using tobacco products, because the are a health threat. It right there on the pack. Then some Congressman convinces his cohorts that taxing the living hell out of cigarettes will bring in tons of money. So what’s the message? Smoke to make us rich or don’t smoke because you’ll die. No wonder everyone is so confused.

Reply to this specific comment

KimmyQueen November 18, 2010 at 1:22 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Well I never confuse liberals as the simple minded people that they truly are.

Reply to this specific comment

Leave a Comment

No registration is required to comment. However, Registering and/or Logging In before posting comments saves you time in future comments posting.

*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.