Variety_Chelsea.jpg
Chelsea Clinton on cover of Variety’s “Power of Women” issue. The million dollar question: why?

Leave a Reply

18 Comments on "Chelsea Clinton on cover of Variety Power of Women issue"

Notify of
poppajoe49
Member

Chelsea Clinton on cover of Variety’s “Power of UGLY Women” issue.

There, that’s better.

Ignored

Not so silent
Member
PinocchioParty
Member

im so sick of these creatures

Ignored

Trickie
Member

Hill & billie’s daughter is one of the reasons functioning light switches are so important in the bedroom

Ignored

MGAP
Member

Because they’re getting ready to put her in office.

Ignored

KimmyQueen
Member

Who’s “They” … they certainly doesn’t include me… I seriously DOUBT with all of my heart that true sincere Democrats actually want her either… let’s be honest…

Ignored

Fenster662
Member

Just another example of the power of the Clinton crime family. When the history of this sad period is written, the Clintons will be as famous as the Borgias.

Ignored

MGAP
Member

They is the DNC. They will get her elected, if she wants to run. Half the country voted for her mother to be our president. Democrats are stupid.

Ignored

KimmyQueen
Member

If that is the true cover, y’all know that her face was placed on the body of another person right?

And yes… why? What has she done? What power does she have….? It is my understanding that she wears an upside down cross too… I don’t like this bitch, she has done nothing in the planet that is of any value and everything she has now to this day is because of her parents… absolutely nothing inherently wrong with that, but if she decides, she is a powerful woman and has made a difference on the Planet then she is delusional.

Ignored

Joe Redfield
Member

Are they taking about the ‘power of women’ who happen to be related to ex-Presidents?

Ignored

JPTravis
Member

Maybe. All I know is if I was a woman I’d be insulted that Chelsea Clinton represents the power of my gender.

Ignored

KimmyQueen
Member

I am greatly offended… not just her, but Blake Lively? Really?! Jessica Chastain is just another leftie lunatic who last movie bombed miserably (an anti 2nd amendment movie), who the hell are the other two women? And the Black lady looks like a man… not because she is Black but because bitch looks masculine…

Ignored

danybhoy
Member

The Blake Lively looks good on her cover. Don’t know much about her, but she looks ok.

Ignored

KimmyQueen
Member

This isn’t “Women that look ok” issue… This is Power of Women Issue…

She has done NOTHING of value or consideration for like three or four years perhaps more. She cannot carry a movie on her own. She married Ryan Reynolds and that is about it. If she has something else going on, it is not well known nor meaningful enough for it to be have at least been in the news… so Blake Lively yeah she looks ok so what? This is about women who have power… What about Melania Trump? Or KellyAnn Conway? Or Marine Le Pen? Or British PM or heck even Oprah… I am sure there are women who have done advancement in STEM fields…

2 actresses that have done nothing of value nor worth…

One tranny looking lady, another lady I have no idea what she does maybe those two are something…

and then one woman who has LITERALLY done NOTHING with her life other than exist.

Ignored

danybhoy
Member

Fair point

Ignored

Not so silent
Member

Someone really, really photoshopped that face. Dog butt ugly is hard to change without a lot of work.

Ignored

CO2Insanity
Admin

Looks like Web Hubbell….

Ignored

Not so silent
Member

Web Hubbell is a better looking woman than this trailer park trash.

Ignored

wpDiscuz