Badda bing: “Obama is anti-E F Hutton. When he speaks no one listens”

by editor on August 14, 2011

Charles Krauthammer nails it again. No other talking head can match the man’s ability to distill it all down to a few simple, memorable words.

“Well, we were talking here about how detached and disengaged he appears and how disturbing it is particularly for Obama’s allies in the press. But the irony is that even if he were undetached and concerned and involved the markets have shown that he is the anti-E. F. Hutton – when he speaks no one listens. The markets take no notice whatsoever of what he does and the reason is because he has no idea. He’s out of bullets. He’s out of arrows. He doesn’t have a clue.”

He doesn’t even have a clue where he might find a clue. He’s cluelessly clueless.

And just in case you’re too young to understand the E. F. Hutton reference, here’s one of their commercials from the late 70s or early 80s.

{ 58 comments… read them below or add one }

beanhead54 August 14, 2011 at 3:40 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 21 Thumb down 0

CK rocks…. period, paragraph, end of statement.

Can’t wait to hear Slowlivia’s defensive rant on this one, so we can throw the “prejudice against handicapped pundits” card in her face…

I like this place. It’s fun.

Reply to this specific comment

RIM August 14, 2011 at 5:56 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 16 Thumb down 0

The anit-E.F. Hutton.. that’s good! Charles is in a class of his own. Nobody can lay it out so eloquently as he.

Reply to this specific comment

Al August 14, 2011 at 5:57 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 24 Thumb down 0

When Krauthammer talks, people listen.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 14, 2011 at 6:31 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 12 Thumb down 0

A lot of people knock him for being an “Establishment Republican”. Me? I love the guy’s work.

Reply to this specific comment

RKae August 14, 2011 at 9:32 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

I love the guy’s work AND knock him for being an “Establishment Republican.”

He writes and speaks eloquently. He’s very brilliant; makes excellent points. But, sadly, when all’s said and done, he’s very “business as usual.”

Reply to this specific comment

perlcat August 14, 2011 at 7:13 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

All too true.

Still, it’s a zinger.

Personally, I think Barry’s more of an E.F. Timothy Leary — when he speaks, people say WTF?

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 15, 2011 at 2:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

I thought that was Jesse Jackson.

Reply to this specific comment

perlcat August 18, 2011 at 6:56 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

Maybe they’re related.

Reply to this specific comment

PsychoDad August 14, 2011 at 6:31 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 9 Thumb down 0

Wow, how old is that ad??? What a great campaign that was though, huh?

Reply to this specific comment

danybhoy August 14, 2011 at 2:37 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

I remember those spots from about 25-30 years ago when I was in school. They were good ads.

Reply to this specific comment

Progressive Hemrrhoid August 14, 2011 at 8:36 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 13 Thumb down 0

Actually He is technically incorrect, somebody must be listening, because every time Obummer opens his mouth, the Stock Market dives.

Reply to this specific comment

StrinaM August 14, 2011 at 10:02 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

You are right… Progressive Hemrrhoid! Krauthammer has it wrong… When he speaks, the Dow plummets 200 points… I wish they’d take no notice. Maybe my portfolio would be worth a couple of pennies right now.

Reply to this specific comment

perlcat August 14, 2011 at 7:15 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

When he speaks, America’s retirement fund shrinks — much like how his man eggs shrink when Moochelle speaks.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 15, 2011 at 2:38 pm

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 7

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 15, 2011 at 2:41 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

And who was in charge of Congress during those years, Bitch? Maybe, in your brilliance, you could draw us a little chart, so we can understand.

Reply to this specific comment

beanhead54 August 15, 2011 at 2:54 pm

Controversial. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

MH: “When it comes to hard numbers, do your research first; then you won’t need to pull your head out of your ass.”

You might want to look at some HARD numbers that say we were in a “mini recession” the year GWB took office, or the fact that some planes hit some buildings somewhere pretty HARD and a HARD war sorta’ happened, or the fact that a Democrat held House refused to address a HARD over-heated housing market as well… but then again, with YOUR obviously swelled head so far up YOUR ass, it would be HARD to stuff all that reading material in as well.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 8:16 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 7

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 18, 2011 at 8:25 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

What exactly did the previous administration do to cause 9/11? No fair blaming Clarke or Tenet, though right, since they were Clinton leftovers.

I will be the first to beat on W for domestic policy and the prosecution of the war in Iraq but 9/11 was by no means a personal Bush failure. Of course, you could cite some evidence that proves me wrong.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 8:34 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 7

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 18, 2011 at 9:39 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

Mitch doesn’t cite evidence, it’s against his religion. Thirds.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 10:39 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 18, 2011 at 11:36 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

Hey, if you are all for the buck stops here mentality with every leader, that’s fine. I would imagine that you are equally disgusted with BHO’s inability to take responsibility for anything. Literally anything that I can see.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 25, 2011 at 10:52 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 3

I am equally disgusted with Obama’s constantly blaming Bush for the economy. Obama never should have taken the job if he couldn’t handle the load.
“Anything” is too big a word. Obama’s admitted to screwing up, but only on insignificant issues.

Mitch Hoops August 25, 2011 at 11:02 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

Five thumbs down for the truth…Bush wasn’t Commander in Chief on 9/11. 9/11 was all Clinton’s fault–a liberal conspiracy authored by Clinton/Obama. Gotta’ love those Limbaugh Lemmings! Feel better now?

Reply to this specific comment

beanhead54 August 25, 2011 at 11:24 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 1

MH: “The planes hit because the Commander in Chief had his head up his ass and failed to do his job. NO excuses there, either.”

You might want to do a little of your OWN research about how hard it was for GWB to get his people vetted and seated around the table. Seems some silly folks had a problem w/ a stolen election or something like that, and kept blocking aqppointments. It’s all right there, go read it.

You might also want to remember that the previous administration castrated our intelligence community and drew down our military as “unnecessary” and a “peace dividend” following the end of the cold war with the (now defunct if you haven’t heard) Soviet Union.

I swear, linear thinking Libs are a hoot.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 25, 2011 at 12:17 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 2

I’m not gonna read it….”linear thinking”?…We’re talkin’ tofu now, right? Is that a Yanni/John Tesch/Dr. Phil-coined phrase? Always an excuse for Bush. Always. Now Bush is a victim. Pathetic.
If we now get attacked with another 3K dead civilians and the Empire State Builiding/Chrysler Building in rubble, I can turn to Right Wing Nut obstructionism/appointment blocking as Obama’s reason for not doing the job.

Reply to this specific comment

beanhead54 August 25, 2011 at 1:24 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 0

MH: “Always an excuse for Bush. Always. Now Bush is a victim’

No, we the people are the victim. The victim of people who fall in behind a candidate who is no more than an empty suit and a “feel good phrase” which cannot be backed with either logic or pre-constructed plan.

We want easy answers to difficult questions because our attention span has shrunk to the contents of a 30 second sound bite. We don’t read any more and we don’t think any more because we’re too busy hurrying home to catch the next installment of the Jersey Shore.

Yeah, linear thinkers. I see, I want, I need, I take and not a whole lot more.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 25, 2011 at 1:43 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 0 Thumb down 2

unbelievable…Bush, the Commander-in-Chump, is accountable for nothing regarding 9/11…zip, zero, nada. And then I get a Dr. Phil lecture…i’m gonna’ puke.

Reply to this specific comment

beanhead54 August 25, 2011 at 1:50 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 2 Thumb down 0

MH: “i’m gonna’ puke.”

Thinking makes you THAT dizzy? I’ve proven my point.

Reply to this specific comment

David Bishop August 15, 2011 at 7:48 pm

Controversial. What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 1

Woah woah, IHTM commenters, back off the guy. Mitch, I know you’re probably as irrelevant as JM Keynes when it comes to true financial analysis, but I’m gonna clue you in on something.

Check out the price of gold the day Obama took office, and check out the price of gold today. That speaks far more volumes of any market then does the DOW’s closing numbers.

Next?

Reply to this specific comment

editor August 15, 2011 at 7:57 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

David, I assume you mean “back off IHTM commenters” since we said nothing in this thread.

Reply to this specific comment

David Bishop August 15, 2011 at 8:02 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 1

Apologize Editor. It was sarcastic anyways, but it’s fixed :)
By the way, how the hell do I upload my photo on this site?

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 16, 2011 at 6:58 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

I’ve often wondered that myself.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 8:30 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 6

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 8:52 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 1 Thumb down 3

BTW, I’ll never forget Reagan’s tenure. On his watch, the Dow traveled from under 1k to 3K…just awesome! Credit where credit is due.

Reply to this specific comment

FormerlyDeanH August 18, 2011 at 1:04 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

After Carter dug that deep hole there wasn’t a person in the room that didn’t know to stop digging. Ron just pointed the way. Oh, and brought down the USSR and improved the lot for hundreds of millions of people, not just the hundreds of millions of Americans either.

Reply to this specific comment

David Bishop August 18, 2011 at 10:20 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 1

Why would over 30% of gold hedgers and investors drop all assets in gold over the next year and a half?

You’re either ignorantly optimistic, or simply ignorant if you think the economy is going to improve over the next year.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 18, 2011 at 10:29 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

As long as the Indians and Chinese continue to buy gold by the ton, the market will move upward. The guy buying a few ounces from a gold company advertising on cable TV is not moving the market.

http://www.chinapost.com.tw/business/asia/india/2011/08/19/313873/India-and.htm

When they decide it is time to sell off the price will crash.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 11:26 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 4

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

perlcat August 18, 2011 at 6:56 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

Well, dude, check out Jesse’s Cafe Americain.

http://jessescrossroadscafe.blogspot.com/

The guy is nervous. The problem is gold can go higher, but it means that the economy is sick indeed. However, going by what he said about buying silver, I will not put anything into an etf or into any metal that isn’t shipped to my door. Turns out there is a fractional reserve scheme going on with silver.

Reply to this specific comment

Mitch Hoops August 18, 2011 at 10:31 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 0 Thumb down 5

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 18, 2011 at 1:03 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

No, it’ll go higher. Actually, I look at it as the dollar going lower, since gold has a steady and intrinsic value of it’s own. The dollar, sad to say, no longer does.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 18, 2011 at 1:26 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

I totally agree, it is not so much gold rising but the debasement of the dollar. To the Swiss, whose currency is very strong versus the dollar, is an ounce of gold, really as expensive to them is it is to us?

Reply to this specific comment

poppajoe49 August 18, 2011 at 1:08 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 3 Thumb down 0

As long as the economy keeps tanking, and Obama thinks it’s the summer of recovery, gold will go up.
The thing is, gold is an inflation hedge, if it goes down, you lose nothing in buying power. The price of everything else, except maybe oil, will go with gold.

Reply to this specific comment

john August 14, 2011 at 12:51 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

‘The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they’re ignorant; it’s just that they know so much that isn’t so.’
-Ronald Reagan

Reply to this specific comment

danybhoy August 14, 2011 at 2:39 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 10 Thumb down 0

The person you want to hear from ain’t Obama, but whoever is on the other end of his BlackBerry. Obama is just the frontman.

Reply to this specific comment

poppajoe49 August 14, 2011 at 6:58 pm
The Dogfather August 15, 2011 at 8:45 am

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

So Carney said Obama WILL have ideas on deficit reduction??? WILL HAVE??? How long does it take that dipstick to come up with an idea? Oh yeah that’s right he’s gotta wait for his buddies Axelrod and Ayers to tell him what to say.

I have an idea – FIRE the entire White House staff….that’s probably tens of million right off the top

Reply to this specific comment

CJPR August 15, 2011 at 11:50 am

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 7

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

FormerlyDeanH August 15, 2011 at 11:52 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 1

Oh great swammi, surely your crack pipe is empty again.

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 15, 2011 at 2:43 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 5 Thumb down 0

I’m sure you’ll be here to eat that big ol’ crow after the election, right?

Reply to this specific comment

MDLION August 15, 2011 at 8:39 pm

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 4 Thumb down 0

CJPR:”when Obama wins his Landslide re-election in 2012″

You really think he is going to improve upon his 52.9% from 2008?

Reply to this specific comment

CJPR August 15, 2011 at 6:10 pm

Poorly Rated. Do you Like or Dislike? Thumb up 1 Thumb down 8

Hidden due to low comment rating. Click here to see.

Reply to this specific comment

Sidekick August 15, 2011 at 6:20 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

I’d be interested to here more, CJPR. Can you explain how a proposed balanced budget amendment could lead to another 1930s style depression?

Reply to this specific comment

David Bishop August 15, 2011 at 7:56 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 8 Thumb down 0

Can you please elaborate? I would love to see your fiscal analysis of commodity pricing and government regulation in housing markets and how it did not lead to the financial collapse of 2008. I’m quite interested. See, you’ve failed to underscore the economic isolation of things like wars which self-generate internal revenue while providing external debt simultaneously, while showing your extreme ineptitude by considering that government regulation in loan applications for houses didn’t have an effect (or even be the root cause) of our 2008 collapse.

I love your premise though. The sad part is that it is fiscally implausible to place blame on Bush entirely. (I will say here that I hated him myself, not for the wars so much, but for NCLB and Medicare Part D)

Next, let’s analyze the fall of the greats, such as FANM, FREM, and Lehman. Once again, where do you see the fall of these giants? Oh yes, government intervention.

It’s a shame you leftists are so ignorant of economic theory or applied economics and simply parrot fed lines from the media.

Next.

Reply to this specific comment

ddiddly August 15, 2011 at 8:19 pm

Rated Awesome! What do you think? Thumb up 7 Thumb down 0

Dude, my ass hurts after that and it wasn’t even mine he was tearing a new one!

Reply to this specific comment

poppajoe49 August 16, 2011 at 5:39 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

David’s analysis does have that effect on people. It is tough to battle with him and win. so far I think the count is David, Infinity – challengers, 0.

Reply to this specific comment

RockingHorseGuy August 16, 2011 at 7:02 am

Like or Dislike: Thumb up 6 Thumb down 0

I’m thinking CJPR might be another one of those “enlightened” liberals that thinks reading a book is time wasted.

Reply to this specific comment

Leave a Comment

No registration is required to comment. However, Registering and/or Logging In before posting comments saves you time in future comments posting.

*

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.