{ 3 trackbacks }

Most Inappropriate Logo Design Ever
April 20, 2009, 7:01 pm at 7:01 pm
Most Inappropriate Logo of All Times « Diezimedia
April 23, 2009, 6:02 am at 6:02 am
That was Then, This is Now … | Into Temptation
April 28, 2009, 1:12 pm at 1:12 pm

{ 16 comments… read them below or add one }

Chuck April 20, 2009, 5:32 pm at 5:32 pm

This is sooo bad, funny, but bad.

Reply to this comment

Kevin April 20, 2009, 5:46 pm at 5:46 pm

I can’t see it :( . Is that white circle supposed to be a testicle or something? Is it a slight against that American who won the Grand French Bicycle thing, since it’s only one circle?

What am I missing?

Reply to this comment

Tom April 20, 2009, 6:29 pm at 6:29 pm

Hahahahahaha! If I wasn’t laughing, I’d be crying!!!

Reply to this comment

Robbins Mitchell April 20, 2009, 9:16 pm at 9:16 pm

Well,I guess it’s kind of like a Rorshach ink blot…you see what you want to see….but if I was a Catholic altar boy,and I saw this logo,I’d run like hell

Reply to this comment

Kevin April 20, 2009, 11:19 pm at 11:19 pm

Testicle in a Y shaped cup? Seriously, I’m missing the humor in this image, and I HATE THAT! Someone please clue me in.

Maybe the white circle is a penis as viewed from the front?

Reply to this comment

Wogan April 21, 2009, 12:48 am at 12:48 am

Fwahahah! Maybe the approval committee were all newbie priests … or women?

Reply to this comment

asd April 21, 2009, 1:33 am at 1:33 am

no, the boy is viewed from behind and is giving the priest a blo*job

Reply to this comment

Smarter than half of you April 21, 2009, 2:55 am at 2:55 am

You must be Americans; the first thing you see is a penis. Anyway, what the author probably intended you to see is a boy giving head to a priest.

Reply to this comment

Chris April 21, 2009, 4:15 am at 4:15 am

Omagad, I see little child su***ng ***k

Reply to this comment

Kevin April 21, 2009, 7:20 am at 7:20 am

HAH! Ok, I see it now :) . Thanks for clueing me in.

Reply to this comment

Ray April 21, 2009, 7:25 am at 7:25 am

LOL.
Prophetic?

Reply to this comment

Jim Treacher April 21, 2009, 9:27 am at 9:27 am

Second look at Sinead O’Connor!

Reply to this comment

Jason April 22, 2009, 9:34 am at 9:34 am

This is why the Catholic church has problems now. In the 70s, they were using a logo only pedophiles would find attractive. Look at their workforce now.

Reply to this comment

KathyMary April 22, 2009, 9:58 am at 9:58 am

Oh, that is sad and terribly funny. I do want to say I still belonged to the church until 1970 and I even worked as a maid and cook at an abbey and saw nothing inappropriate or sordid, nor heard rumors. Heck, the abuses I saw were just plain human nature – people with power using it unkindly.

Reply to this comment

Administrator April 23, 2009, 11:00 am at 11:00 am

Could you guys who like this site, and this story, kindly do us a small favor? Well, the chief Editor here actually was the one who discovered this long lost logo a few days ago. And the story has been popular. So popular that others are of course grabbing the image and blogging on it. But it was a bit disheartening today to see on Andrew Sullivan’s blog, that he just posted it I think yesterday and already has around 700 Diggs. He didn’t do anything wrong, he credited the site he found it on, who had likely found it on ours and did not follow proper etiquette and credit us. We’re emailing Andrew now to ask if he can change his credit link. But, in the meantime, can you do your IHTM buddies a favor? Can you click the Digg Button at the top of the article to Digg ours so we aren’t completely run over by the massive traffic on Andrew’s piece on The Atlantic’s website?

Reply to this comment

Administrator April 23, 2009, 11:28 am at 11:28 am

Strike that 700 Diggs from 27 minutes ago. Make that 1500 Diggs now. (:

Reply to this comment

Leave a Comment

No registration is required to comment. However, Registering and/or Logging In before posting comments saves you time in future comments posting.


make custom gifts at Zazzle