Bill Maher is a filthy racist who hates Muslims

by editor on November 6, 2010

We’re not proud to admit this, but we agree with Bill Maher on something. Please do not hold this shameful admission against us. We beg you.

Last week it was revealed that the most popular boys’ name in England was Mohammed. Much to conservatives’ surprise and to liberals’ dismay, Maher said he was concerned about the “alarming” number of “baby Mohammeds” in England.

Wolf Blitzer interviewed the obnoxious HBO host and the CNN host just couldn’t believe that Maher actually said something so rational.

Much to our surprise, Maher didn’t back down. He said he sees no reason to “apologize for being a proud Westerner” or for being concerned that “Muslim people are in these [Western] societies“ having babies ”at a faster clip than non-Muslims.”

He called himself “someone who believes in the values that Western people believe in that a lot of the Muslim world does not, like separation of church and state…”

“I would like to keep those values here,” Maher said.

Why do we get the feeling that this is like that episode of Dallas where Pam finds Bobby in the shower and learns that the entire previous season was one long dream that never really happened.

23
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
11 Comment threads
12 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
15 Comment authors
drbflashingscotsmanSidekickTheDarkEricDravenVeil Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
TheDarkEricDraven
Guest
TheDarkEricDraven

Only Republicans would like someone for acting like an asshole.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick

I’ll wager not one Republican likes you. There goes that theory.

TheDarkEricDraven
Guest
TheDarkEricDraven

I’m the hero, Sidekick, it’s justified to be mean against bad guys such as yourself.

Sidekick
Member
Sidekick

You’re the hero? LMAO.

flashingscotsman
Member

Two turds in a row. I feel better now.

Veil
Guest
Veil

What are your western values?

Racism, Imperialism anti-Islam and so on
Ha,
You keep being loyal to zionists so as to get paid well

flashingscotsman
Member

I’m getting paid well? First I’ve heard of it.

drb
Member
drb

Where’s my check?

DirtyDan
Guest
DirtyDan

I hate Maher less after watching this.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Ok, maybe just a little bit.

WhiskeyJim
Guest

If you remember the meme, you’ll be ok:)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IRk054bz44g

WhiskeyJim
Guest

In America Alone, Steyn explained European demographics two years ago. He is branded an extremist, and soon after taken to court in Canada for inciting hate speech, or whatever rationale they use to justify their kangaroo court.

Who brings the message is terribly important in any Stalinist type command and control regime. You see, you have to know who to trust otherwise the wheels fall off the carefully constructed bus.

redneck
Guest
redneck

Hey guys don’t be too hard on yourselves about agreeing with Maher on this issue. Afterall, as Perlcat mentioned, even a broken clock will give the correct time twice a day, which is more often than Maher, but I’m sure you get the idea.

thebigdeels
Member
thebigdeels

I actually agree with Bill Maher on this. And, despite being a conservative with libertarian tendencies, I agree with most of what he says about religion, too.That said, he is absolutely right.If Whites would stop having sex only for orgasms and stop trying to play one-upmanship with their neighbor all the time with regard to material possessions, their birth rates might actually come back up to replacement level. Like it or not, our Western civilization is dying because we do not reproduce ourselves anymore. And that fact in itself very well could lead to another Dark Ages if fundamentalists of any stripe, especially Muslim extremists, take over Europe and America.

KimmyQueen
Member

The interesting thing though is that you CAN see whenever there is a declined of religion in a country/continent (the country/continent becomes secular) there is ALSO a serious decline of birth rates within the people who originally lived there. Europe is becoming more and more secular and alas original Europeans are making less and less children.

Even if individuals choose not to choose a religion to practice it is best to live within a country/continent that has a good number of people that do choose to practice BENEVOLENT religions. Benevolent religions have utilatarian properties that even the founding founders (even those that did not wear their religion on their sleeve) acknowledge the useful nature of benevolent religions within the borders of a country. Benevolent religions tend to undermine corruption, unethical practices, respect the law, pay taxes (not to steal) and so on. They tend to teach community living, charity and family… They tend to say that killing a child for selfish reasons is not appropriate it is even detrimental to the country and to the person and encourage people to enter into mutually beneficial and loving relationships with one another including marriages which leads to creating a family unit and increasing the numbers of the citizens of the country and those children are thought morals regardless of them continuing with the practices of faith of their families at least have a moral and ethical base where they can be responsible members of the country who pays taxes, lives without corruption and so on the cycle goes. Jefferson and other knew this and wrote about it in length.

“RELIGION” is not perfect, but the truth of the matter is that there is religion and then religion. Not all religions are the same nor equal REGARDLESS of what liberals/progressives say where they equate everything to everything else. It is not possible to say that Islam and Christianity are one and the same, or that both present the SAME dangers to humanity. It is not possible to claim that a true and sincere Christian person would hijack a plane and fly it towards a building and cry out “In the Name of Jesus Christ I am killing all of you and me and the people in that building”. It is not possible, YET you can see that fundamentalist in Islam (those who follow Islam to the letter), DO believe in doing such things, BECAUSE it is part of their teachings. One religion is CLEARLY more dangerous than another. The fact that he and others (atheists, agnostics, people from other religions) are not willing to admit that there are marked differences and they are not in quality the same and decry the one that is truly dangerous more often and with more strength than the other who is not truly dangerous… I find hypocritical and detrimental to real and intelligent conversation.

KimmyQueen
Member

I do believe in separation of church and state IT IS NOT IN THE CONSTITUTION however as a philosophy it is sound. It is not APPROPRIATE for a state to announce a state or nation religion. It is not appropriate for the state or state leaders to determine what a person should do for worship, who to worship and what to say when one is worshipping. Obviously Mr. Maher and I do not see separation of church and state in the same way. I see it as a protection for churches and church goers and faith people FROM the State/Government… Bill Maher sees it as the protectiong of the State/Government FROM the Church/Faith People. In a way that is fine because if a Church gets too big and too powerful to BECOME a State (like Islam) that leads to oppression as well, but his fears have been primarily towards Christianity and that has not been Christianity (true Christianity) goals whereas IT IS the goal of Islamic people/countries/leaders. Any time when Christian leaders could have taken over the country they never did nor was there an intention to do so probably never crossed their mind as their Christianity probably told them to respect the law of the land (The Constitution) but EVERY SINGLE TIME a liberal/progressive has the opportunity to take over with their own religion/ideologies they ALWAYS take that chance. When they are repudiated they slink back and wait for the next opportunity and infiltrate EVERY SINGLE TIME. The same for ISLAM every single time you allow muslims to gather power they will ALWAYS want to intervene and take advantage of the space provided to take over … every single time. It is an historical fact. Sure Christianity has had its bumpy times and its errors but that has been people not the faith in of itself, whereas Islam the religion itself DEMANDS power and control.

I am glad that Maher said what he said, but he knows that in the end he is a coward, he STILL prefers to beat on Christianity when Christiainty is not his real enemy.

perlcat
Member

He prefers to beat on Christianity because it is safe. He likes to pretend he’s cool, subversive, even ‘edgy’, but when it comes to actually standing against oppression a la islam, he’d rather not, as he might get hurt.

A more intelligent person would say to themselves — “maybe I should not beat down the religions and institutions that either do not harm me, or will protect me if I am afraid to combat the religions or institutions that will harm me, and will not protect me.” Then again, he wouldn’t be a liberal if he did that.

perlcat
Member

Meh. How about that. Just like a busted clock — right twice a day, and not worth a shit besides.

michael
Guest
michael

Maher is such an narcissistic clown, he is the quintessential bad tempered little terrier dog that lives under the porch of a news network, runs out and bites at passerby’s ankles and when they confront him he runs back to his security, his owners at the networks allow him to run out and bark allot at guest for ratings, sort of a off centered reality show with a terrible script. I have never understood why he is on the network, exactly what has he done in life that makes him such a self professed expert on humankind, politics, economy or international relationships? the only thing I see is a bad tempered bark, that could easily be handled with a rolled up newspaper.

danybhoy
Member
danybhoy

Look, Bill Maher is an ass. However, he is an being consistant on this one, he hates ALL religion, not just Islam. He does’nt rationalize like Rosie does, he hates them all.

KimmyQueen
Member

Which is fine… however he SHOULD give credit where credit is due like a few weeks ago when he generalized that all conservatives were this and that and George Clooney had to educate his ass. His overreaching hatred blinds him from certain facts and truths about the things that he hates. Also even though he doesn’t have love for Islam (seemingly) he doesn’t beat on it like that other Atheist does (Michael Hitchins?). He is a coward he acknowledges that if he beats on Islam and its REAL dangers he will probably be beheaded or get a fatwah, so if have moments of lucidity but THEN he retracts and goes back and beats on Christians more. It is pathetic.