Obama caves to Iran on every issue. Bend forward world. You’re about to get Iranian nukes up your ass.

  • Iranian nuclear research intensifies
  • Sanctions will be lifted
  • The arms embargoes go away
  • Iran can limit inspections
  • Obama has said he will veto a Congressional action

So what did we get? Screwed, that’s what.

Nuclear Explosion

28
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
14 Comment threads
14 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
12 Comment authors
Marita: Iran will smother us with crude oil | Sandia Tea PartyMarita: Iran will smother us with crude oil | Gadaboutblogalot's BlogMarita: Iran will smother us with petro - For God's Glory Alone MinistriesProgressive Hemrrhoid6 November 2012 Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
Notify of
trackback

[…] Obama caves to Iran on every issue […]

trackback

[…] Obama caves to Iran on every issue […]

trackback

[…] Obama caves to Iran on every issue […]

Progressive Hemrrhoid
Member
Progressive Hemrrhoid

All orchestrated by that vile Iranian whore Jarett.

6 November 2012
Member
6 November 2012

The whole thing has been a decades-long charade that the Obama administration does not need to keep anymore.

The Shah of Iran, knowing how he got into power and what happened to Persia 12 years earlier, decided in the 1950s that Persia would have its own nuclear capability, otherwise Persian sovereignty would remain a joke.

Until the revolution, Persia collaborated with Israel and South Africa on a obtaining a nuclear capability.

So they have had an arsenal for a while now, hence why Bush Jr wanted a US capability to intercept missiles.
Not missiles aimed at Tel-Aviv or even London but New York, Washington DC & Chicago.

AZ Dude
Member
AZ Dude

Once I heard Obama say “”Every pathway to a nuclear weapon is cut off,” I knew we were screwed. “If you like your doctor. . . “

Not so silent
Member
Not so silent

Treason…The only thing Obama and Kerry are known for….When the shite hits the fan in a couple years, and it will, Obama will be running around blaming republicans like always and never accepting responsibility for one of the stupidest acts every committed by a sitting (while peeing) president…A legend in his own mind, I wonder when he starts selling his paintings in beer halls?

6 November 2012
Member
6 November 2012

It is only treason if the whole thing wasn´t a charade and Iran wasn´t a nuclear power with ICBMs already.

SpecOpr8r
Member
SpecOpr8r

What we’ll get is the bomb…dropped on us! Besides it’s what Val Jarrett told him to do!

perlcat
Member

Well, if they blew up DC, that would give what I like to call “mixed feelings”.

whiskeyriver
Member
whiskeyriver

The Obummer likes his deal and still no word on when the American journalists and aid workers being held hostage will be released. Way to go Kerry, you dumb f**k, you did a real good job of negotiating for us didn’t you.

MGAP
Member
MGAP

This deal will get the Iranians the cash they need to accelerate their nuclear weapons project. Next up, they nuke Israel. When this happens the American jew will scream for revenge. The American conservative will scream for revenge. The American jew will continue voting democrat and the conservative will vote republican.

Why do we, as conservatives GAF about what happens to Israel? What purpose do they serve for our country? Israel is a money pit for the US. Until the American jew plus their heads out of their collective ass and start voting for the party that defends Israel, I say loft them ( Israel ) out in the breeze and let them defend themselves.

I’m not being anti-Semitic here, I just don’t understand what purpose defending and funding the Israeli states serves. Can anyone explain to me why we care? I don’t need to hear “because they are our only reliable ally in the ME.” They are our ally because we give them money and weapons. If we stopped supporting them, do you think they would still be our ally?

perlcat
Member

I can understand the sentiment, and I certainly agree with the “Why are we, in our current economy (or any economy) shipping boatloads of cash to ANY other sovereign nation.” Unless there is a pro quo, I don’t want any other sovereign nation to have my quid in any way, shape, or form. Other sovereign nations need to take care of their own issues.

As far as I see it, Israel has a messaging problem to Jewish people the world over. This is about survival as a nation and survival as a people. If an American Jewish person can feel so complacent about the fate of Israel and their fellows living there that they can in good conscience go along with people whose *STATED AIM* is the destruction of Israel and the total annihilation of her people, then in theory, I need a lot of convincing myself before I think sending them cash altruistically is a good idea.

(I actually do think sending them aid is a good idea, and the reason has nothing to do with their interests, and everything to do with my view that their very existence is a lightning rod for the exact sort of people we need to have taken out with drones, as sh*t splatters.)

I know, people will tell me that it’s about free will, and choices, but I figure that if six million deaths weren’t enough to trigger a self-preservation mechanism, then I need clarification in my role as a potential supplier of self-preservation. I mean, come on, people, the same brand of monsters killed your aunties. Pay attention.

I’ve heard that it is as a form of atonement that this form of sef-destruction is acceptable — but I don’t buy that for a second. It is a matter of political convenience. If you ever can manage talking to a lib, you realize there is a fundamental difference. They believe government can effectively grant them rights and privileges, and that they are simply shopping for the best deal — even when that deal runs completely against every single principle of liberty and freedom. Completely unaware that any “gift” from the government is a resource that was confiscated from someone else — and a government that views a Donald Trump as having “too much” today and wants to force him to share will think that Joe Middle Class also has too much, and will use the same mechanism of tyranny to force him to share as well.

Bear in mind, I know many Jewish Americans who are aware of the issues and do vote and act accordingly. That’s about the only thing that gives me hope for the situation.

JPTravis
Member

Nice post. Yes, it is aggravating to watch Jewish Americans vote for Democrats but mostly, I think, we are aggravated because we see the most visible Jews voting Democrat. The Spielbergs and Streisands etc. I don’t think the Jewish demographic is nearly as monolithic as people make out. They’re not as dependably Democrat as blacks, for instance.

I don’t get so offended by Jews making mistakes since, as a Christian, I know that’s the default mode for us all. That’s why we needed a Savior to forgive us. That being said, I believe in support for Israel because it is the one foreign aid situation that makes moral sense: for once we support the democratic believers in the one true God, aligned against the demonic forces of evil which surround them, instead of following State Department forays into dead-end diplomatic acts of so-called pragmatism which NEVER seem to work out. I wish all our foreign aid followed that reasoning.

MGAP
Member
MGAP

I ignore and don’t regard the Hollywood elite as anything more than egomaniacs making noise to remain relevant in their own eyes. I’m pretty certain the entire east coast jewish voting bloc swings hard for the democrat candidate every time. They are also the first to scream for helping the motherland. Doesn’t make me sympathize for the cause.

JPTravis
Member

Spielberg, after leaving his half-Jewish wife for non-Jewish Kate Upshaw, had her convert to Judaism. I’m guessing he thinks that makes him good. And I’m guessing with the amount of money he has, his local rabbi agrees with him. It’s a mess, no doubt, because these are the imperfect people who end up speaking for Jewish people, simply because they have fame.

MGAP
Member
MGAP

Regarding monsters that killed the Aunties… The reason Hitler and his SS were so successful at killing so many jews, is that Europe supported and allowed it to happen. As the war wound down American troops “discovered” the killing camps and were completely taken by surprise. I don’t believe for a second that anyone else on the continent was not aware of what was happening. They knew and supported the elimination of jews from the continent by any means. The jews were disappearing, they heard the stories and chose to ignore them because they wanted the same thing.

My Czech father in law was taken by the Nazis and forced to work to support the German war effort. To the day he died, he always used the word ‘filthy’ before the word ‘jew.’ He hated them even more than the nazis, even though they used him as slave labor and forcibly moved him from his homeland to work in Germany.

I agree that the new monster is Iran and the entire ME would turn a blind eye just like Europe did during WW2. Right now american jew is also turning their backs on their supposed motherland by voting for and re-electing the very people that are eroding the security of Israel. Makes them the same monster IMO.

6 November 2012
Member
6 November 2012

Except many of those being deported did not suspect it themselves, picking cotton mades more sense.
Just like most average people will b surprised this fall.

Since there was a war going on, the governments of the US and UK had plenty of reconaissance going on, camps and their purpose would not go unnoticed by analysts and intelligence, it was eventually decided that bombs would not be wasted on railways when they could be used on cities.

Do you really think he was mererly prejudiced? Or something that happened to him that is worst than being forced to work?

Turn a blind eye? Yes, their eyes would be blinded and melted by the brightness of hundreds of “salted” thermonuclear warheads detonating over middle-eastern cities. The Al-Aqsa mosque in Jeruslaem would be destroyed by artillery, Mecca and Medina would be turned into smoking craters along with the holy sites of Shia Islam.
That is what the dem jews realize well, Islam would suffer the most epic pwning in its history.
If the Obama administration allowed that to happen, who to say that a submarine or two wouldn´t head for New York and Washington DC?

6 November 2012
Member
6 November 2012

Very simple, the jewish dem voters knows what the Samson option is.

That is, they realizes that if Iran was to attack Israel, the consequences would be catastrophic not just for Iran or the Shia branch of Islam but Islam and moslems as a whole.

The holy sites of Islam would be reduced to smoldering craters, the Al-Aqsa mosque is within artillery range.
Hundreds of warheads would detonate over major cities of North Africa and the middle-east, killing off more moslems than the whole of WW2 in just 30 minutes or so, this would be before entire countries breaks down into complete anarchy and fallouts from “dirty” warheads comes to play, do I need to go on?

Not Iran and not Isil will risk that happening, the leaders may send suicide bombers but they don´t want to join Allah anytime soon themselves, especially not as those leaders who lead the Ummah to its greatest ass-kicking ever.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

The town I grew up in has a very diverse Jewish population, from the ultra orthodox Hasidics to the ultra leftist reformed. The Hasidics vote for Democrats because they need their freebies. They don’t have jobs for the most part, since the men are permanent rabbinical students, and the women give birth and take care of the kids. They live on welfare, section 8 food stamps, etc. The Orthodox voted Republican, because they know the score, the reformed are too far leftist to know better.

jukin
Member
jukin

SO my best guess is there was nothing left that Iran wanted.

Neville Chamberlain has been replaced by Barak HEUSEIN Obama.

perlcat
Member

It’s “Sodom” Hussein. Just thought I’d clear that up for you.

Dyrewulf
Member
Dyrewulf

And, just like the Clintons, this will blow up in a few years when there is a Republican in the white house, and all of the idiots will scream “OMG! Look at what the REPUBLICANS let happen!!!” just like 9/11 and the financial crash. The bullshit never ends.

perlcat
Member

Libs wanna offend us by burning flags that represent our ideals; the US flag for what it represents, the Gadsden Flag for the resistance to tyranny, the Battle Flag of the Confederacy for independence of thought. I propose that we burn white flags in order to offend our government.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

That idea has a dual purpose, it will also offend the French.

MGAP
Member
MGAP

Pop FTW!!!

JPTravis
Member

And they are of course selling this deal and praising this deal as a “landmark deal.” Why not? The American media will repeat whatever Obama says.

poppajoe49
Guest
poppajoe49

I saw Kerry trying to sell this deal on TV, saying how good it is.
F him, he’s an idiot.
It’s only a landmark deal because it’s possibly the worst deal ever made.