Government climate scientist wants to kill you. And your family. And a lot of other people.

by editor on January 6, 2011

John B. Miller, a scientist for the U.S National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration spoke at a global warming rally and eco-wacko extravaganza back in October 2009. That’s where he announced that the “master variable” of climate change is population control. Oh, we beg your pardon. Not just population control, but population reduction.

I’d be remiss, as a scientist who studied this, if I didn’t mention the following two things.

The first is that, most importantly, we need to do, as a society, in this country and globally, whatever we can to reduce population. [Cheers, applause] It’s the “master variable” that controls everything [shouts of “That’s right.”].

And what I mean by this is not just in the developing world where it’s a known fact that empowered women have been a proven strategy to make healthier, wealthier and smaller families. [More cheers, more applause] But additionally and especially in our country and other developed countries, we have a population problem, because our per capita emissions are higher than anybody. Yet we continue to have – and this is true in every industrialized country – lots of tax benefits, encouragements to have more and more.

Our whole economic philosophy is based on growth, and growth of our population, and this madness has to end.

We assume that Miller will be the one deciding who stays and who goes and that his name will not be high on the list of those going.

H/T: Breitbart.tv

61
Leave a Reply

Please Login to comment
25 Comment threads
36 Thread replies
0 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
23 Comment authors
Stop_ChemtrailsalienKimmyQueenArlanandycanuck Recent comment authors

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

  Subscribe  
Notify of
Stop_Chemtrails
Guest
Stop_Chemtrails

Why don’t he the “scientwist” COMMIT SUICIDE already? Show us an example and DIE already!

RockingHorseGuy
Member

It is a fact that the least desirable among us are the ones having the most kids. And a lot of that, at least in this country, is subsidized by our government. You don’t even have to believe in evolution to see what reverse evolution is doing to this country. And trust me, the Europeans DO mostly have their eyes open, and see what Islam is doing to their countries. The EU is a failed experiment in socialism, as is every experiment in socialism. I’m glad I’m old, I don’t want to see what this world looks like in 50 years.

john
Member
john

Your saying what I meant all along.

KimmyQueen
Member

The EU is horrible and it is a big fail and Europeans know it and now there is nothing they can do about it.

Now… those “least desirable” are still people (they have their rights) and just because they suck perhaps and are irresponsible, shouldnt put a limit to how many kids I can responsibly have. I don’t see how my rights should be curbed because of the mistakes of others. The fact that they believe in Mom/Dad government again shouldn’t be okay in desiring people like me to limit our offspring. Why should I do with less when I can responsibly have more? That is all that I am saying. These things tend to be or get BLANKETED whereas at some point it goes from lets curb the amount of children for the “least desirables” to let’s make sure that ALL people curb their progeny.

What stops them from deciding that poor black women on welfare are least desirables and they shouldn’t have more than one kid from morphing into all black women (because they can pocreate faster I guess) shouldn’t have more than one kid and going back to the eugenics movement where doctors were aborting children of native americans and black women without their permission and in many cases scarring and damaging their wombs so they can never have children again? It is a dangerous path.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

What you’re talking about, Kimmy, is exactly why I don’t want government limiting who has children. They’re not good at making decisions. You may have noticed that I didn’t mention race, color, or religion in any way. The government wouldn’t agree with me on this, but I would determine who is the least desirable by how self-sufficient the person is. On government assistance of any kind? Ok, no kids until you’ve gotten off and stayed off for a prescribed period of time. You have your kid and then go back on? Then the period of time you must stay off assistance for the next one is doubled. Don’t want to tell the welfare agency who the father is, so he can be tracked down and help pay for the child? No problem. Permanent sterilization. Call me mean, call me a bastard. I’m ok with that. But the welfare state must be shut down. And this is without regard to race.

john
Member
john

I’m with you, makes sense.

KimmyQueen
Member

The problem of course that there will be a greater amount of so called minorities with the negative consequences than whites, as well that the majority of the ones with the negative consequences will be poor. That may start a race and class warfare. I think it is safe to say that minorities and poor citizens are in the end at the majorities of numbers. It will not be pretty. Breeding ground for socialists and progressive liberals. If conservatives start implementing those measures, that is the end of the conservative movement. As I mentioned the poor and minorities will form an overwhelming majority and egged on by the liberal movement will run over the conservative movement and kill it. The other consequences is that there will be great numbers of abandoned children, people leaving their children at hospitals and orphanages en masse and even perhaps at the steps of middle class and wealthy people. Abortion will go through the roof and all consequences stemming from that, that I don’t even want to think about. Charities will be overwhelmed and in a climate where charities are being treated like crap I dont even what to think about that either. I can see so many unintended consequences here…

In any case, I will have to think harder about a middle ground. Obviously it is not a good idea that irresponsible people just keep having children and then the government keeps subsidizing the irresponsibility…

BUT no one human being has any right to mandate whom has the right to have children or not, because in the end it ALWAYS… ALWAYS… leads towards the road of absolute control.

There has to be a middle road here and in the end it goes back to humans taking responsibilities for their own actions…. but how to achieve that without controlling people? I guess that is the question. Not all people are the same and many will make bad choices regardless of what any person does or says. I have great dislike of government (human on human) control. It always lead to issues many unintended and it is the least able and the least in the society (the aged, the infirm and the children …) who pay the highest price.

The only thing that I can think of is basically let people fail when they make mistakes and not bail them out, BUT extend a hand of help towards those that had no part in the decisions and errors of others (the infirm, the aged, the children, etc.). However I believe that those centers of aid for them should be concentrated heavily on the private or non-government sectors.

Thinking back to what you wrote IT COULD WORK as long as it is kept on the private/community sectors. That is to say incentive communities to take care of those that are more adept of making mistakes or have already made them and they in turn incentive those people from making mistakes or creating more of a problem by providing some of the restrictions that you stated. Without government intervention people will have to rely on their communities and I am sure the major numbers will be responsible even if it is not coming from inside of them.

I dont agree with sterilization unless we are talking child molestors and rapists.

alien
Guest

He’s not talking about killing people. You guys actually scared of this guy?

Fear not, gentle friends, he’s talking about having less babies, and letting the population shrink through attrition. This is already happening in a number of countries, even industrialized ones.

I’ve had 3 kids, so i’m part of the problem, i guess. But I’m not all anxious about him coming after me grandaddy

KimmyQueen
Member

No he is not talking about killing adults… however we must ask him how he feels about abortions even in later term… even if the child is a “viable fetus” or a “potential human being”.

No, as for me not scared just simply disgusted.

Not really, as an example, white europeans are having less children BUT the minorities who are quickly becoming majorities (Africans, Asians, etc…) are having more babies. One day Europe will become a muslim continent and that is because of the great number of muslims been born in the continent. So yes certain groups are having less children but the population per se is not being shrinked, because the children of the “native” europeans, so to speak, are being replaced by the children of the immigrants (legal and illegal) from other cultures.

So the population of the world will NEVER shrink UNLESS people like this man successfully win over centuries old cultures that pride themselves in the ability to reproduce as quickly as possible and unless there is a war and this guy and his group wins… I find it hard to believe that him and people like him will successfully have muslims (for example) just have one child per pair just by being nice about it.

Considering the lost lives of many girls (through abortion, abandonment, etc.) in countries like China where a one child a pair is a law or at least strongly “advised” by the government I dont think government involvement on birth control is a good idea. Birth control should be between a woman and her family and her doctor.

People like this guy who advocates population control inevitably leads the Nazi route… it ALWAYS leads to that route, once power is placed on their hands.

alien
Guest

I’m not really concerned about White Europeans losing their share of the global population.. If Europeans feel threatened they will naturally populate more. Many Europeans are simply not as concerned about the Muslims in their midst as you might think. The debate about this outcome, there, is as vigorous as it is over here. Some countries are actively fighting population decline, rather than having encouraged it or instituted population controls.

Besides, globally, i’m not so sure whites have EVER been the majority.

I’m not much concerned with the population rising to 10 billion, or even 15 billion. I think we can cope with that. If we get to 100 billion or more, and haven’t begun shipping it into space cities, i begin to worry.

Scientists often, by their nature, think decades or centuries into the future.. but they start screaming today. Maybe this guy is advocating mandatory birth control, but i didn’t hear him say that. I heard him say something about tax-advantages for those who have children.

I realize you yourself didn’t accuse him of contemplating the mass killing of citizens. Others here did, and that’s just dark dark fantasy

KimmyQueen
Member

I didn’t give you that thumbs down by the way…

Okay you are not concerned about Europeans not pocreating okay what am I supposed to say about that? It is your concern (or lack thereof)… life is life. Valid.

Well I guess you will have to live in Europe for a few months at least and then determine the level of threat they feel about the muslim issues. It differs depending on the country but they are getting there.

As for massive pocreation it is going to take a lot of cultural changes and willingness in order to get that going again and overall they are having less babies so who knows if it will ever be like before WWII again.

Okay the Europeans were an example… I even said , as an example… I didn’t said nor implied that whites were a majority anywhere I am not sure how you would grasp that from what I said, as that wasn’t even a point to be made *shrugs*.

I am sure the same issues are happening in Asia and in Africa and even Latin Americans where some groups for many reasons(economical, cultural, religious, etc.) are having less children and other groups (for same reasons perhaps) are having more children and it is possible that we can find similitude between europeans declines and the declines of populations in other continents. I guess larger studies are needed for that.

“I’m not much concerned with the population rising to 10 billion, or even 15 billion. I think we can cope with that. If we get to 100 billion or more, and haven’t begun shipping it into space cities, i begin to worry.”

Why? When it does happen, you and perhaps very close generations of yours will have ceased to exist. Why worry about a tomorrow you have no control over and you may never get to see nor experienced (and neither close generations grand and great grand children)? If the Earth cannot handle 100 billion then… well… it won’t. It will flood, it will burn, it will ice over, it will do whatever to get rid of the excess and hopefully there will be survivors… it is what it is. I cannot live my life that way. I do plan for the future, but not that much into it especially possible hundreds or thousands of years into the future where I and close generations of mine will no longer be a lingering memory. I got stuff to concern myself with now and in this moment tomorrow is for tomorrow and that far into tomorrow doesn’t bother me.

Scientists concerns shouldn’t engendered this much hysteria nor these desires to control people and their decisions to have as many babies as they can afford and be responsible for. Anyone like this who uses the word tax is a big red flag for me.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Who would these people have making the decisions about who can or can’t have children? A government bureaucrat?

Arlan
Guest
Arlan

absoulutely a government bureaucrat, who else is qualified for such an important decision. Ask the Chinese.

KimmyQueen
Member

Once we go down this road we will going to have to say bye bye to personal liberties.

Kyle
Member
Kyle

Nobody on earth is going to tell me that I can’t have children. So what, if we can’t stop everyone from having children, we pick who does and who doesn’t? There is absolutely nothing sane about this. If you want population reduction, there are 2 choices: pick who can and cannot reproduce/limit to 1 child per family or kill off a number of people. One is ridiculous and reminiscent of China, and the other is completely insane. There is NO in between choice.

Sometimes I wonder what is wrong with people… there are just some things that no matter how you look at it, it appears as horrifying. I’m trying to figure out what’s worse… the fact that this guy is a mental case, or the fact that people actually applaud him.

KimmyQueen
Member

It is horrifying and scary in both cases. I don’t understand how this is appropriate in any way shape or form. Who is this guy that he should make those decisions?

sa_rose
Member
sa_rose

THis is the same crap passed around in the late 60’s-early 70’s. It has not resulted in any decrease in population, but it HAS changed the . . . ummmm. . . composition of the population. Intelligent, well educated, predominately American and Western European families slowed their reproduction, and added the fact that women are waiting longer to have children, thus resulting in fewer births in that population. Other areas of the globe, the poor, the ill, the irresponsible continued to have children, in some cases because they didn’t buy the hype, but mostly because they didn’t have access to or declined to use birth control. So guess who makes up the majority now? The pattern used to be only 2 children-replacing yourself only. Didn’t work then, and is not likely to work now, except in the population that keeps the wheels turning on the planet. Who will care for all those poor children when the better educated, wealthier population is such a fraction of the overall population? We seem to be advocating a return to the past. And it cannot be done.

Lark
Member
Lark

Wow. First of all, I’m not particularly religious, in the conventional sense. It just seems pretty logical to me that we’re all here for a reason and a purpose since… well… why else would we all be here? Yes, murderers and rapists are here for a reason, too. I’m not saying that I LIKE that they’re here but they do have a purpose. Having had my life touched by one of those very people, I can say that I’m a stronger person now for having come through a harrowing experience. I don’t know what his lesson was since I didn’t stick around to find out but I have always trusted that he had a purpose, too.

Why can’t kids play in the forest while the wildlife lives there, too? I didn’t say I want to see all open spaces filled with shopping malls. I just said that I happen to enjoy shopping malls, personally. Why can’t we have both malls and forests, in moderation? Again, we come to that word “balance”.

Who said that the end is coming? I didn’t say that. You seem to have made an assumption that I am a religious nut who hates the environment. Of course we should do what we can to keep the planet clean and beautiful but there reaches a point when people are losing their jobs over environmental extremism.

I contend, John, that perhaps because you apparently refuse to have faith in any sort of higher power, you’ve made the environment your deity. How is someone running around telling everyone that they are some sort of horrible person for not putting the environment above the needs of humanity any different from someone who runs around telling people they will go to hell if they don’t accept Jesus? Both people believe that their way is the only way and that the rest of us will be punished somehow if we don’t accept the same beliefs. Environmental extremism is the new religion of our time.

KimmyQueen
Member

You are an amazing individual…

Lark
Member
Lark

I am? Thanks, Kimmy. 🙂 I’ve read a lot of your posts and I think you’re pretty amazing, too.

KimmyQueen
Member

Yes… yes you are, you are welcome and thank you! I love good thinkers… and as a person who has also gone through things, I appreciate people who take life and all that it is and run with it with positivity (to the best of our abilities) This is what this country was based on. Have a wonderful day and weekend.

Lark
Member
Lark

Thanks, Kimmy! You, too. 🙂

john
Member
john

Your statement that every human is here for a purpose is religious based and is illogical. So some freak that murders people or rapes little kids is here for a purpose right? And yea there is still some open space but there are also other life forms on this planet that need those open spaces and just being able to see them is calming but you seem to believe that it is all for humans no matter how we use it. The religions all seem to have at least one thing in common and that is the end is coming and there is nothing we can do about it since it is Gods plan so using up resources and having as many babys as possible since they are all blessings doesn’t matter. Well I don’t believe all that baloney, and think we should be doing the best we can to keep the planet beautiful and clean for all the generations down the road.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

John, I don’t think anyone here would object to the elimination of child rapists. What do you think this is, a liberal site?

Lark
Member
Lark

John, maybe the problem is where you live. Where I am, there’s nothing but trees and mountains all around for kids to play in. It actually kind of bores me. I much prefer a bustling city with some shopping malls.

There is plenty of Earth left for us. I’m all for being responsible about recycling and all that because I’m an economical person and if we can re-use something, it seems logical to me to do that. But this hysteria over the environment and over-population is ridiculous.

Another thing – every single human is here for a reason. We all have a purpose and a right to pursue that purpose to the best of our ability. Maybe the kids of that crack whore will grow up and overcome their roots and start a company that provides jobs for others, or become a teacher and touch lives, a minster who helps other kids get off the streets, a scientist who discovers the cure for some disease. And maybe their story will inspire others to work hard to overcome obstacles in their own path. What right do we have, as a society, to choose who can be born or not? Absolutely none.

And as for burning or freezing – we won’t. Again, no creature on Earth adapts like we do. It’s not about abusing the Earth so much as it’s about having some common sense about how we take care of the environment without sacrificing the human race in the process. There has to be a balance. This guy above has no balance. I *think* that Kimmy was calling him a freak, not you, but you’ll have to check with her to be sure.

KimmyQueen
Member

That is exactly what I think. Who are we to decide if there are “enough” people on the Planet or not?

And yes I was talking entirely about the idiot with the microphone in the video.

KimmyQueen
Member

If I am responsible, have the money and the land/space if I feel like having 20 kids… trust me… I will have 20 kids. Ain’t no one on this planet going to tell me what to do, when having children is not against the law nor is it detrimental to the immediate environment at all especially since I am making space for them in the world. Obviously irresponsible people having children is not the norm nor is it appropriate, but it is what it is… but why should I deny myself children of any number because of the irresponsible people? Sure I can adopt many children too, but if I want to have them from my own body who is going to stop me?

What is he advocating abortion? Is he saying that we should murder the orphans? Is this man insane…? I dont find this reasonable at all. Who the heck does he think he is? and people like him? It is normal to get pregnant and have children. Children are normal, treating them as viruses and diseases that need to be cut off or reduced is evil as far as I am concerned. Considering that the Earth was built for human habitation and it ALWAYS seems to have enough space through the times, I dont even understand where this histeria is coming the heck from?

If we overpopulate… if we burn or if we freeze why the fear? It is what it is. We all die and overall the Earth will be ai’ight. The Earth always regenerates it is part of life. Freak!

john
Member
john

“Considering that the Earth was built for human habitation”, that’s the difference between you and I, you think the Earth was built for humans to do with as they please, as a gift and every other life form is here to please humans. “If we overpopulate… if we burn or if we freeze why the fear?” Yea that’s a real good attitude. I know the Earth will continue on no matter what we do, I’m not worried about that, what I care about is the quality of life for my daughter and grandson, I wish they could enjoy the open spaces and play in the woods like I did as a kid, but all those open spaces are now filled with housing tracts and shopping malls and crack whores with 9 kids all from different fathers. And each one of those kids will likey have 8 kids each and soon enough the U.S. along with the rest of the world will look like the movie Idiocracy, but most of you don’t see a problem at all. And watch who you call freak lady.

KimmyQueen
Member

First off… “watch who you are threatening mister…” I am not scared of you. I am no better than you, that is in stone, but I can assure you sir… that you are no better than me. Your threats and your attitude is ridiculous and they mean nothing to me… I debate all kinds of people, all the day long for so many different reasons and on so many different subjects. I try to keep things civil to the best of my abilities, but I am nobody’s fool. I hear veiled inconsequential threats every day, and I feel it is the mark of a weak person.

If I feel like calling you a freak I will do so and I will do so as a DIRECT reply to your post. I am not passive aggressive I say things to people in their face as much as to their face as possible. So what exactly are you planning to do to me if I do so chose to call you anything? Ah? What? Ohhhh shaking in my boots… Not really. What you are thinking that I am some weak woman? You got me all kinds of wrong. I can assure you I have dealt with more menacing people than you. Come to my house with that attitude I have bullets that would like to say hi. How is that for a threat? It is not a real threat, because I don’t play those meaningless games, but I can assure you in real life you better have something real to back up that attitude… mister. An anonymous guy with an attitude in a blog is nothing to me. So you can keep your attitude and put it where the sun doesn’t shine. You are the bully here. You could have chosen to ignore my post… as I wasn’t talking to you.

Second… as I just said… next time pay attention, I wasn’t even talking to you, nor was I talking about you. Considering the entirety of my post there is no way that you can ASSume that I was talking to you or about you as I wasn’t talking to you or about you in the first place. The arrogance to ASSume that I was talking to you or about you (hence your attitude) is astonishing. What? You are still reeling from the former conversation? Perhaps yes or perhaps not… but overall I am over it and I was over you, so don’t give yourself so much importance… Mister.

By the way there is a lot that makes us different, yet still with that said there is more likeness than not. We may both want what is best for the Planet, but I don’t believe that hysteria of people has most foundation.

The world WAS meant for human habitation. Look around can you live in Mars…? Jupiter? We cannot even make those oh so promised lunar colonies from 30-40 years ago. Sure this is the only Planet that we have for habitation SO FAR that we know, but just because it is the only one that we know of, it doesn’t mean that it wasn’t meant for human habitation. In fact it does mean that it is.

If the Earth isn’t meant to be used for our purposes (as long as we take care of it and are responsible) then how the heck do you suggest we live our lives? Sure… there are a**w*p*s out there that do not care for the Planet at all or very little, but why exactly should I have to do with less (less children, less resources…. whatever) in order to make up and pay up for the idiots? That sounds a little too socialistic to me. You do with less if you want to, but telling others that they have to do with less and using laws to punish people to do less with their lives (less children… whatever) is an abuse of my basic human rights. Also do not go assuming too much about what I belief or not. I do believe that this is a human habitation, but I do belief that we are stewards of this yes… gift. It is a gift and I belief we are stewards of such a gift and hence we must take good care of it precisely for the fact that it is a unique island home that we cannot leave to go habitate somewhere else. So no I don’t believe that people can do whatever the heck they want… and no I don’t believe that every other life form is exactly here to please humans either. People in antiquity until now should have been more responsible for several species of animals that no longer exist and will never exist again and there are a lot of life forms that we would better leave alone. Next time ask before assuming and putting words figuretively in my mouth.

Yes that is a really good attitude. It is an attitude of a person that is not afraid of what is coming next. A person that enjoys her life TODAY and is grateful for the life she has TODAY and although looks forward for a wonderful tomorrow, but knows it is not promised (to anyone), so she deals with it like all mature adults should, instead of being hysterical about a future that it is out of our hands. A person that will teach self reliance to her children, but also that life is short and although responsible they need to live it without fears and hysteria.

If the Earth cannot deal with humanity then it won’t. If it means the end then it means the end… What? am I supposed to break down and cry woe is us! Lets have less children even though we can be responsible and take care of them… lets eat rabbit food each day, lets all pedal bicycles on the highway, lets not even use horses because oh… how dare we use animals, lets depend on the government… heck no! I know me and I know that I try and do my best to be a good steward and that should enough. If others want to do with less great, but if they are going to have this attitude I am going to have to say something about it.

I know that there is very little I have absolute control off and so I don’t go around asking people to do with less, nor do I succumb to hysteria. I am not an arrogant person. What I can control I will, but what I cannot I know I won’t and I will deal with it as it comes, knowing fully well I did my part. These people and their need to control is disgusting and again I will say something about it.

If your area is overpopulated and it is not easy for your kids to live in or you worry that a crack whore will get in their faces… or whatever… then move… there are many places with open spaces, where your children can be safe and what not. If you believe in community then get in touch with people around you and form the community that you want it to be and get rid of the crack whores and get rid of whatever is it that bothers you. Get creative and active… build a park from an empty lot, create vegetable and fruit gardens that the community can use. Ask community and join them in order to help these crack whores. Help them become useful members of society. Champion for the small businesses in order to get rid of the big malls that offend you. Man… do something! Complaining about it is not going to do you nor your kids any good. Telling me that I need to do this and I need to do that is not going to change this… The only one you can control is yourself and the only changes you can make are on you… then you and other like minded people can shape the society that you would want for yourself and your children. If you really are feeling the crunch on you then do something, until it is not longer in your hands and then brace knowing you did your part. Do your best for yourself and your children it will have to be enough, because you cannot control everything. Whatever happens happens… best to be like a scout and always be prepared and when you cannot be prepared then brace for it. I am not afraid of the end… I don’t see why people would be. Whichever way the end comes it will come and there is nothing anyone can do about it.

You don’t want this country and the world to go to hell? Then move and do something positive today right now… knowing fully well that the future will do what the future will do and the Earth will do what the Earth will do and again whatever you do as long as it is responsible it will have to be enough.

john
Member
john

You seem to be the touchy one and with the angry responses. And saying “watch who you call freak lady” is some sinister, bullying ,veiled threat, that’s funny , your really reaching for some sympathy there. I know that I can’t do anything about the worlds population and I don’t stand on street corners talking about it but when I see the subject brought up on one of my favorite web sites I’m going to give my oppinion and not keep silent. I have tried to keep my replys civil but since I don’t believe in Daddy upstairs some of you flip out. As for that so called threat, I thought you had called me a name and was responding. I think other neutral readers can judge our responses.

KimmyQueen
Member

Blah blah blah blah blah blah… I didn’t reply to you, I was talking about the story, but because you are an arrogant sod who likes to dish it out but cannot take it back, you took it to mean that I did when I didn’t and acted tough and now are acting wrong and strong… Whatever… I am done with you. I have nothing else to say to you. I am not reading your posts, you have become so insignificant to me at this point in time that I really could care less about whatever you have to say.

Do yourself a favor and ignore my posts too, because it seems that it doesn’t matter what I say you have an axe to grind and the worst attitude in the world hence why you probably cannot get along with most people.

Have a nice life.

john
Member
john

Talk about someone that likes to dish it out but can’t take it. Your so called debateing skills are like a liberal.

KimmyQueen
Member

LOLOLOL you are pathetic. Trust me I can take it, but I also dish it out which is what you don’t like. I bet you expected me to just take it and let you win… sorry to dissapoint you and STILL I called you on your mistake and your error and YOU STILL don’t want to see where you went wrong. You are actually the liberal around here suggesting that is completley acceptable for people to curb their reproduction… whatever I am truly done with you man. You are seriously pathetic. I know I hit a nerve with you earlier but I did respect you, but now I got no respect for you. Continue to talk your mess little man. Goodbye.

john
Member
john

I lost all respect for you also. Reread your own posts, all you do is call names. Sounds like your ready for a stroke.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

Go get him Kimmy.

hisham
Guest
hisham

John did your handlers let you out of you padded cell again? Did you stop taking your meds? Leave KQ alone, she’s not your size. She’ll squash you like the bug that you are!

john
Member
john

jeez what a couple of suck ups. Go through those reponses and see who was being a name caller, in fact very much like a Joy Behar.

KimmyQueen
Member

hisham,

Thanks for that, very much. It is all good though. I even forgot about this little incident already. That is how insignificant it is. I don’t sweat it. I know that I am not in the wrong here so my mind is at ease. I made two resolutions vis a vis online chatter:

1. I won’t feed verifiable trolls (those whose entire post history show trollish and idiotic behavior)
2. After 3-4 posts I won’t bother with those (who were not initially verifiable trolls), that seek to cause a problem for no reason, out of anger or hatred or out of share ignorance. It is not uncommon for some people to get angry at me, when we disagree, sometimes it is my own cause, sometimes it is initiative of the other and desire to be angry with me for whatever reason… regardless after 3-4 posts if it is no longer worthy of my time and I no longer have respect for the person I’ll move on.

That way I stay cool as a cucumber while the trolls fester in their bile. I got a pretty full life and I ain’t got no time to get into long term meaningless discussions with angry people that it seems have nothing better to do with their lives.

I enjoy your posts please continue you are awesome and funny and most of the people here are awesome and funny, and hence it is all good in my neighborhood.

Enjoy your weekend!

Lark
Member
Lark

Reminds me of the book “The Giver” by Lois Lowry. Scary stuff. You know what strikes me most about Progressives? It’s that their chief motivation seems to be fear. Fear of life, of change, of not having total control. So the weather changes a bit. Big deal. Humans have been adapting to the changes of the Earth for thousands of years. Life is not constant. Suck it up and learn to adapt and thrive.

KimmyQueen
Member

Exactly. Enjoy life. Be responsible with it. Help those that aren’t if you so feel like it but without wanting to control all aspects of their lives. Life is life. It will end. Better get used to the idea.

Alan
Guest
Alan

Wonder if he’s met Canada’s Climate Change Guru/Nut, David Suzuki, father of five kids…

andycanuck
Member
andycanuck

And two wives (one ‘ex’) and has a property valued in the millions on a British Columbia island that’s only accessible by boat or air.

john
Member
john

” They are every bit as narrow minded and convinced of the perfection of their message as muslims are covinced of the perfection of Islam.” That goes for what your saying as well. He didn’t say anything unreasonable. He wasn’t advocating killing people like you are trying to insinuate. Will you all be comfortable with a world population of 10, 40 or 100 billion? That’s the future

Arlan
Guest
Arlan

How is it that u think population control is implemented? Killing babies is just the start. then you go to the old folks. Sterilization of the unwilling, murder of the innocent, and genocide of the helpless. You don’t get significant population reduction with education, it’s no where near fast enough. There has to be an active effort made.

rightinwa
Member
rightinwa

How much longer will the mentally ill control the microphone?

YT
Member
YT

Forever.

Checkout the book “How to be a successful tyrant” by Larken Rose. The media provides a sick sort of adverse selection when it comes to the mentally ill, aspiring two-bit dictators.

max
Guest
max

So lead by example comrade

Ruben
Member
Ruben

Who’s this guy… the Population Nazi?

NO MORE KIDS FOR YOU!

hologram5
Member
hologram5

Has anyone shown this tool the news headlines about the record amounts of snow in regions that haven’t had snow in fifty years or more? So much for his and Al’s warming BS… He should further his cause by taking a bullet…

whiskeyriver
Guest
whiskeyriver

How about the first ever “white Christmas” in Raleigh, North Carolina in recorded history? Or the near record cold temperatures all across Colorado and New Mexico? Here in the Land of Enchantment today we are going to have a little above average highs in the east side of the state while the west side of New Mexico will have high temperatures a little below seasonal averages. Does this mean half my state is experiencing globull warming while the other half is in the globull cooling stage?

whiskeyriver
Guest
whiskeyriver

Is this maroon for real? Our entire welfare system is set up to encourage more babies. Our immigrant system, and the lack of enforcing the laws, encourages illegals to have more babies in this country. The only “responsible” women in our society are those born and raised here, who work for a living instead of sucking the taxpayer teat, and understand how hard it is to raise a child in todays world. This is not true of all illegal immigrants, no more than it is true for all women on welfare. But, we have to look at the majority, not the few that do better for themselves.

jukin
Guest
jukin

The cult of AlGore has been and always will be made up of that relatively small percentage of people that hate themselves.

Etaoin Shrdlu
Guest
Etaoin Shrdlu

What is amazing is that this guy actually fancies himself to be a scientist!

hisham
Guest
hisham

These idiots are nothing but social jihadists. They are every bit as narrow minded and convinced of the perfection of their message as muslims are covinced of the perfection of Islam. I think that’s why they get along so well–the rest of us and anybody left, after we’re all dead and gone, who isn’t suffiently likeminded must go as well…until only man made perfection is left. What selfish, narcissitic, ego-maniacal bs.

Lee
Member
Lee

Wouldn`t bother me any if this freak would do a little something for the cause and kill himself.

RockingHorseGuy
Member

I didn’t see any of his cheering fans stepping up onto the stage and volunteering to reduce the population by offing themselves. Or him. Sad.

Old Goat
Member
Old Goat

You would think, wouldn’t you, that if the inevitable mission was to reduce the population of mankind, they might PROMOTE their alleged Man-Made Climate Change, as the ensuing combination of predicted catastrophies – like drowning from sea level rise (of a few millimetres), starving from desertification (when the Sahel is spreading), and roasting from the horrendous rise in temperature, (by about 0.5 of a degree) – would bring about a certain demise in human numbers.

But they want us to STOP the climate warming – that’ll be fun, considering it’s been on a rollercoaster ride for 4.5 billion years, in order to “save the planet”. IF (and I say IF) the planet is warming (and I don’t believe it is – quite the opposite), then surely that’s a GOOD thing for life in general, and humankind in particular, isn’t it? Surely they’d be better off encouraging us all in our wicked ways, thus invoking the Gods of hellfire, which would bring about our imminent and timely destruction, which is what these people seem to want to achieve. Methinks they have their logic ass (or arse, if you’re British) about face. (if logic, indeed, they possess…)

whiskeyriver
Guest
whiskeyriver

Very good point, I had never thought of it that way! Those of us old enough heard all this same nonsense in the late 1960’s. Manmade pollution was causing globull cooling and the earth would be in another iceage by the year 2000 if something was not done right away. Mankind as we know it will be gone, the birds and bees, most wildlife, everything will be frozen under hundreds of feet of ice as far south as Florida. Your take on this fits the “science” of the late ’60’s and early ’70’s. If man is the problem then let things freeze to get rid of the human factor!

Oh, and in America we say these kind of people have head-in-ass syndrome. They do not have glass stomachs and cannot see where they are going.

nuke
Member
nuke

slightly reminiscent of the Nazi party.

YT
Member
YT

Slightly?

“The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force” – Adolf Hitler

At least these people are starting to be honest about their intentions.

trackback

[…] This post was mentioned on Twitter by I Hate The Media and others. I Hate The Media said: Government climate scientist wants to kill you. And your family. And a lot of other people. http://bit.ly/hZIv8G […]